Personal Quotes IV

(Quotes, questions and ideas will be continuously added.)

• Let children be children. Childhood is the part in life where children develop creativity and a foundation to develop what they want to be in life.

• During times of distress, good people should pull together and help each other. If necessary, in secret.  

• I believe people should behave and communicate with a level of honesty. They should never have to fake being themselves. In addition, they should always communicate and behave in a way which is civilized and respectful to others.

•  I believe one has the right to be angry, even if it is an anger beyond comprehension. However, due to civility, respect, and rationality for others, anger should be kept to oneself and not publicly displayed for the sake of social harmony. If anger is displayed, perhaps it's best to leave that person alone to cool off from their rage before talking rationally and logically. Also if one is angry, they can express the profoundness of their anger in words that have equal meaning or feeling. Curse words are extremely unnecessary; however, can be an exceptional form of extreme outrage whenever seemingly necessary.

• A crazy thought I had is that perhaps there should be a stop to the motive of revenge. It's with strategy and logic that one should never open any opportunity or possibility to be taken advantage of.

• I found interest in the thought of myself being considered an ethical or moral scientist.

• When it comes to the irrational and ignorant, perhaps it's best to ignore, exclude, or even politely inform them of what is right or wrong. When dealing with such an individual, I believe it's important to maintain rationality, respect, civility, compassion, patience, and humility. If they become angered then it's best to move on as their situation seemingly cannot be helped.

•  I believe a utopia can be established through one's personal endeavor and integrity of using Confucian-like ethics, morals, and etiquettes.

•  Perhaps wisdom is the product of intelligence, experience, intellect, and behavior.

• My ideas, thoughts, and philosophy is not to be taken as definite guide but an example, because they are what I believe and think is right. One should think for themselves and utilize what they think and believe is ethical and moral. It's okay to make mistakes, the journey of life and with the use of one's intellect will shape one to make greater ethical and moral decisions. Wisdom greatly comes from within. Through what we learn, know, understand, experience, and think, our intellect constantly evolves molding the way we see life, interact, and behave. By gaining a deep intellect our children will see an example and one's intellect will shape their lives. The way we improve the lives of others is by first improving ourselves.

• A great fear of mine is if I become too focused on working and trying to survive that I eventually lose interest or the motivation to do my ideas and dreams. I believe in such a scenario life to me could sees to be irrelevant. I believe there should be a system in which does not allow people to lose faith or desire to achieve their dreams.

• Only give 20% of your time and energy to pity and feeling sorrow for yourself; 30% to recover and getting back up on your feet; and 50% to press on, strategize, and push forward to taking steps for success. With a will to continue towards your goals, your first step has already been taken. If one can dream, one can achieve.

• I had the idea that everyone should have a level of mystery to them that they should extremely rarely disclose with others. This creates a sense of respected individuality. It also creates a sense of curiosity for people to want to know more about you. Also, the more one does not know about you, the less likely they see you as someone to control.

• When one receives great solutions or information, it's worth sharing. Reciprocity fortifies social harmony.

• Free-giving also reinforces social harmony. By this I mean , if one has the ability to give away items of unimportance or of irrelevancy to strangers without wanting anything in return, I would highly recommend them to do so for I believe it could create a culture of giving (especially giving things to strangers). An example is if a farmer has an abundance of oranges he or she does not want to waste, they can then give it away to strangers. Even an average person can do this, they can give items they don't need anymore. I would highly encourage this idea to restaurants, so they waste a more minimal amount of food.

•  Referring to the last idea, I think it could be a good idea to make a non-profit or maybe government funded service to collect food from restaurants and give them to those who would like it, those who cannot afford to eat out, and those who simply are beyond the poverty level.

• I find guns to be an amazing piece of machinery. After shooting for the first time, it became clear that having a gun is no different than having a electronic drill or power saw. Although in many countries guns are illegal, I think it's fair and perfectly acceptable to allow people to have guns, even military grade weapons. Referring to crime, I find guns to be the cultural-related tool to which crimes are committed. In countries that do not have guns, it's knives/blade and club weapons. It's clear the problem is the person using the weapon. I believe with the use of ethics and morals, the idea of committing crime with any weapon is extremely unnecessary, uncivilized, irrational, and completely barbaric. In addition, I believe it is also a good idea to take guns away from those who seem mentally incapable of handling them responsibly.

• I'm unsure what to think about this idea, but I have come to the idea that good girls go after "bad boys" because of culture-influence. Nevertheless, I think underlining truth is that they want to be accepted or have something to show off to society (maybe to make others jealous or to raise their own status/ego).  I think they should turn their attention to those who are passionate for something, highly intelligent, or maybe controversially seem not to have an interest in females at all (like the culturally defined "geeks and nerds"). Although I could be wrong, it seems interesting that young girls want a "bad boy", when mature woman want a "good guy".

• There are so many ways one can word a situation in both the positive and negative context. I suppose the question is how to effectively get someone to respond positively and to get on track and turn their attention and performance in the right direction.

• If communication was more respectful, harmonized, civilized, and open for ideas, if not allowed for the creation of deals, I think rebellious children would be more open to being more accepting or positive towards their parents.

• I think it's best or even important to act in a way that let's others feel they are never taken advantage of.

• I found the Japanese idea to text first before calling a very pleasant idea. If a person does not respond to a text, then one doesn't call, thus not bothering or interrupting the other person. This idea I think also reflects a sense of respect or harmonious convenience to each other.

• Possibly controversial: I came up with the thought, if nudity could be socially acceptable or morally justifiable, then why not something else, why not something outrageous like cannibalism? To answer myself, I would state that I see a logic or a psychology in certain things. I also see a reason in breaking society from some of the traditional cultural ideologies which I think limit imagination and human progress. Referring to the question in a literal sense, obviously nothing like cannibalism unless you want to volunteer (meaning you are still alive because killing is immoral due to the pain and negative stimuli it will cause others) and see what yourself tastes like (I'm not being serious or anything). Moreover, I would say my overall goal is trying to allow humanity to open itself and to transcend thinking, behavior, and imagination. I want humanity to be greater than humanity without unnecessary cultural limitations. If I could, I would make it to where everyone sees each other in a way where they are family (bothers and sisters) where they have a greater sense of community, collectivism, convention, cooperation, and sociology through the use of ethics, etiquette, moral-reasoning, logic, and science.

• I feel the need to briefly state my position in politics. In Japan, I'm liberal. I like being liberal in Japan because it is the side that focuses on a realistic and logical vision of peace. Not only that, I like how Japan is a peaceful country and how their government is currently for the building of defense and not focusing on war or the mistreatment of it's citizens. I believe Japan is a good example for how a nation should pull together, voice their beliefs, and make the most noble and desirable decisions. However, in America, which I told myself not to ever comment much about, I am a logical swing voter, I'm on the side that makes the most logical sense. I have grown very dissatisfied and terribly disappointed with the liberal democratic side for an array of obvious reasons; their change from the 80s and 90s toward current day socialism has made me extremely disappointed. I understand my history, civil rights, the meaning of American freedom and what it means to be an America which I think many Americans never came to know; therefore, I can't help but to be on the republican side. I feel the Clinton and Bush dynasty has a dishonest and controversial agenda which Obama is also a part of. I fear the loss of a great nation, the loss of virtue, the loss of prosperity, and greatly the loss of the innovation of science and human progress. I want what's best for the country and I believe the side in which many hate the most is the side I believe is the correct one in these times of heavy controversy.

• I can see as some people age how they could feel sad because of their favorite times in life which has changed dramatically. I can feel the same as I left Carl Wunsche Academy in 2007 (in the experimental year they opened the academy) and how I recently graduated college, both of which were the best years of me life. Although, I don't think there is an actual solution at the moment, I think perhaps volunteering at places one use to know, working on a project dedicated to this time, or meeting people with similar interests and experiences through interest group might be the best way to contribute or commemorate to the great memories of the past.

•    I believe the point of words is to communicate effectively and to say thing with precision or in direct meaning to how we're feeling. I think the use of constant expressions and slang is an incomplete or half-hearted use of communication.

• If I could describe myself in a interesting way, I would say I'm 30% to the world, 20% spiritual, and 50 myself. To elaborate, I'm 30% to the world (participate in culture and subculture), 20% spiritual (a personal relationship with the creator (of course under the personalized and respected idea that if there is a creator or not ) and perhaps a natural and personal almost zen-like enlightenment), 50% myself with my own opinions, belief, ideas, goals, and philosophies. I believe all this makes up roughly who I am in a unique sense.

• I think the goal of all evil to seek that which is most unobtainable. I think the goal of evil is control, perhaps leading to the take over of the entire world. To go a step further, to dominate and control an entire civilization. If I may take an outrageous step further and for no purpose what-so-ever, I would go a step further and say it is to dominate and control anything intelligent and even that beyond the comprehension of our own imagination.  

• In such controversial times, I struggle to find hope in politics and current events happening all over the world. Although I could be perhaps wrong, at the moment I see no change in humanity. I believe it is a real possibility in which the world will never get a chance at revealing its true potential in creating a peaceful, free, virtuous, and prosperous, society in which ventures beyond the stars. In such a case evil wins, good will one day, perhaps in the vast distant future, rise once more as the fight for freedom blossoms again. History repeats itself, and it doesn't disappoint. The key is to not let it happen in the first place. I would hope that ethics and morality would be the key.

• To be clear, I write for personal enjoyment. I live in an environment in which prohibits my creativity, way of thinking, and even to state my opinions. Therefore, this blog is my only form of voicing my own beliefs, opinions, and ideas. Most of which, if stated publicly, would obvious to be unconditionally scrutinized. I don't mind if anyone reads what I write. All I ask is to be respected and for others to be open-minded.

• I remember when dial-up came out, the internet was unregulated and completely wild uncensored, disorganized, and free. I would love to go back to the internet back in that time period. It had more of a free, open, limitless, and new feeling.The internet of today seems to be mastered and crafted by a censored and regulated design.

• Taking that last idea, what if the world was already filtered, censored, and regulated and we didn't even know it. Every bit of information we were fed was used to their (higher authority, higher intelligent life, or maybe political leaders) advantage and control. We feel what the authorities/ regulators wants us to feel. We know what the authorities/regulators want us to know. I wonder if we'll ever find out if this exists? To explain in more detail, what if our world was like a cage. We were born in this cage (controlled environment, institution or captivity) so the cage is all we know. Meanwhile the higher intelligent life or authorities want to keep us there for controlled purposes. In such a tightly controlled unbreakable environment, will we ever break free? Could we ever see the bigger picture? Can we find greater intelligence, consciousness, and intellect beyond the definitions and limitations of our own imagination? I would imagine such a scenario would be extremely difficult to comprehend and perhaps prove, especially for other (especially if they are conditioned).  

• I don't like our current system for credit. It feels like a system set up for one to fail being how simple it is to fail. I don't find it very flexible or convenient. Certainly there should be more ways to earn credit. I'm not too certain of this idea; however, could the idea of bit coin can be of good use?

• Thinking about the idea of the United States creating a greater safety net system. I came up with an idea of multiple lifestyle-living-condition designed system. To start if I could design a safety net system, I would consider a system designed for people who can choose to work, be on a break from working, or even design a system for those who don't want to work at all. For those who want to take a break from working, they can do so as they please in accordance to complacency or permission of their current job. This time gives a person plenty of time to learn new things, take a long break to find themselves, do their own projects, organize their life, or anything they desire. Nevertheless, I'm sure there are those in society that would not like to work at all. There should be a system designed for them as well. For the society that refuses to work that perhaps would rather live a more liberal or carefree lifestyle, instead of discouraging  this part of society, we should tolerate it and make it convenient part of the system and have individuals living this lifestyle have the ability to create a culture where they are encouraged to obtain education, virtue, status, and to eventually join the work force, if not become perhaps get them to strive to become the intellectual, intelligent, and artistic class of society and be brought opportunities by businesses to do greater things related to math, science, design , and anything intellectual. I also believe this is a place that should perhaps have pockets separated by race also for convenience, comfortably, or in-case of unnecessary dissatisfaction. Although, there should be places with a mix of people too. It also should be continent for those to relocate anywhere if they desire. The catch to this part of society is that they are given minimal but manageable spending power to encourage them to rise in society. Overall, I think it's perhaps good to create a system with multiple lifestyle-living-condition choices. I think there's a lot of greatness that can come out of it. Furthermore, I believe it's important to design a system where people can get the most of their life, do their goals, accomplish their dreams, preserve their freedoms, or be given opportunities to serve society. I haven't figured out where the funding would come from for such a liberal idea, but I simply wanted to let out the idea.

• A tremendous fear I have is having undying creativity and a vast array of great ideas yet unable to utilize or perform anything. I fear my life is a race against time without opportunity to which I can push innovation and imagination. If because of a system, such virtue and prosperity has already been lost. I feel defeated.
•  What if we create a new kind of hiring or labor process or even some way to create opportunity if the country ever gets into a recession or depression. Can this be achieved?

•  I find many cultural changes in every decade. Culture is constantly changing. Because of this, people should undo the bad culture and put in place new culture, good culture. Let good culture make a period in history that defines a generation and sets an example for the future to look back on.

•  Without confidence, confidence.

• When networking, focus on giving than receiving, drive your attention with those you truly want to familiarize yourself with, don't be fake, and never make empty promises.

•  In a conversation, a small period in silence can make a great difference.

•  I believe the police should not be militarized. I believe they should be civil servants with a roll to protect and do justice by law. If they themselves believe the law is wrong, it should be their civil obligation to dispute the law.  

•  If one digs deep intellectually, I think they'll discover the reasons of what they want, why they want it, and why they do what they are doing. 

• I think every form of literature, graphic, film, song, experience, and idea has a force to shape our lives. 

• Could it be the things we watch, the music we listen to helps shape how we think and behave? Especially, if we listen to music for a long time. If that's the case perhaps there should be more nice, good, interesting, or educational things on TV. I'm a fan of anything as an art form, even if it doesn't appeal to me, but just as there is violence, action, and mature things to watch, perhaps there should also be equal things that are nice, good, informative (unpolitical), interesting, educational, and things that spark curiosity. 

• Looking into taxes and how some ex-employees in the IRS deem it is done illegally, conspiratorially, and unconstitutionally, I believe in the case where such a mass investigation ever occurs and taxes are confirmed found illegal, done without proper jurisdiction, or given and used without oversight, or tracked where funds went and how they were used unconstitutionally, I believe the government should give all the taxed money they have taken from the people, back to the people; perhaps even in the form of gold. In addition, to global conspirators, if a secret organization, secret society, or group of global elites were discovered doing wrong using politics as a tool for control, I believe they should publicly apologize for the wrong they have done in addition to trial. 

• If conspiracies are true about other worlds, dimensions, alien life, time travel...etc, Let the world know and let them choose to accept the information along with allowing a new expedition to explore the unknown. Let peace, logic, rationality, civility and reason be the tools for new ideas, innovations, encounters, and events. 

•  I think people should be allowed to break the law if it's level is minor. Of course, if they are caught or found disruptive, they should answer to the law. Nevertheless, I think the relationship with someone who commits a misdemeanor and an authority figure should be a relaxed one.  I don't believe because a law is broken, there should be instant brutality or subjected to sevier consequences. I also think those who choose to break the law in a minor way simply for enjoyment should respect the police officer's job, but not worry of any sevier consequences unless they break a law in a sevier way. I also believe the police or an authority figure should also treat them with as much respect as possible, even if the situation becomes intense and violent (maybe even apologizing if they thought they found themselves too brutal later, this is to set an example of justice, peaceful relations, rationality, and civility). Furthermore, I believe those who do misdemeanors should be treated accordingly to the severity of their crime/misdemeanor. 

• Should highly intellectual, more specifically out-of-the-box thinkers or perhaps abstract thinkers, be looked for and taught complex subjects in science and medicine to seek new innovations, methods, and solutions? Perhaps such minds can bring new, unforeseen, or difficult to understand solutions.  

• Since science doesn't completely understand the human body yet, I believe medicine and health professions can give good and possible useful solutions, however one's health condition should more rely in oneself. I believe one should understand if not learn how one's body is before making a suggestion to medicine and medical practices. Because I believe medicine and health practices are amazing but not completely reliable, or given the business nature of the health industry, I believe one should consult the statistics on medicines with a doctor on medicines the doctor may prescribe. 

• If I could make changes to the medical industry I would: have patient reviews over all medicines; show statistics on medicine efficiency; lower costs of common medicines; change the industry to allow for five main categories of medicines: experimental, herbal/natural, completely reliable, commons and store bought (common corporate-made medicine), and independent.  

• Perhaps contradictory, in a civil society I believe people shouldn't have to worry about social classes, I believe they should find happiness no matter what class they are in. I believe in such a society, it's their choice to raise themselves in status/class in society. However, in such a society, I believe they should have all the essentials of basic survival. They should have a place to stay, food, some entertainment, good education, and much more if they desire it, but since it's the lower class they should be encourages to rise in society so that they can improve upon their lifestyle. In conclusion I believe poverty should be manageable, if not sufficient (not impossible or desperate), to daily survival, a level of happiness and lifestyle can still be obtained, and all poverty have the ability to rise as any other social class in society. 

• My dad almost died choking on a donut today. A DONUT! How sad that would have been. I couldn't imagine putting that on his tombstone. Nevertheless, I believe, every detail and decision in life matter, even if insignificant. 

• To teach others, perhaps one should first be an example. 

• When any topic becomes too serious, find someway to laugh productively (of course in respect and consideration to the situation), or if necessary make fun of yourself. Humor is often a good idea to relieve stress and find a positive outcome or opportunity. 

• To copy another's life or follow in another's path is okay, but it may not be original. I believe originality defines a person. Instead of copying another person's life, I believe one should find their own unique path and define their own sense of originality. A sense of uniqueness makes a person memorable or even unforgettable. 

• How do we know what is moral (what is right and what is wrong)? I think this is a rather interesting and maybe a difficult topic, so my answer may be very rough, inconsistent, or perhaps subject to change. I think perhaps whatever path leads to pain, suffering, or maybe even social decay or devastation is self evident to be immoral. Whatever leads to joy, happiness, virtue, harmony, and prosperity is self evident to being moral. On an idea of something on the edge of morality such as war or maybe even certain perspectives of justice, it could perhaps be seen as both moral or immoral, I think it would be wise to back-track to find the fundamentals to see if there lies the answer if moral or immoral or maybe look to the future to see if it produces positive and productive results.

• In prisons, we should pay attention and understand prisoner psychology. Why do they do the things they do? How can we help them become a rational part of society. what can we do to prevent the inflow of similar crimes? I believe the more we know the more data we will have to find ways to either pass logical laws and achieve a solution to prevent crime in the future. It's my belief that there are good people in prisons, however are forced to do evil. If this is true, then shouldn't these people be sorted out and given a more nicer place to stay? Perhaps they can help set an example to change irrational prison culture. I believe the true irrational, dangerously criminal, and even savage should be on the status of an animal but stilled treated with a level of respect. In conclusion, although I know very little of the prison system, it's my belief the goal of prisons are to incarcerate the irrationally and dangerously criminal minded, but to find solutions in which they can be, psychologically evaluated, repaired, as well servings their sentence, until eventually returned back to society. 

• Perhaps the most effective solution for prison inmates is to get rid of their ghetto mentality and culture and taught that their life has great significance. Perhaps they should be given an institution in which they can learn and become educated. Perhaps those who are sought out to being rational or provide with good qualities that don't desire harm should be given workshops and hands on education to create things from prison (perhaps even agriculture for society). Perhaps turning prison culture into something productive can create a culture of greatness while incarcerated and destroy a sense of doing things to damage society. I also believe after a prisoner is released that they should feel an obligation to do good and protect society and it's country as a civil obligation. Perhaps their greatest hope is giving back to society as a means of apology for what they had done. 

• Should someone convicted of murder or an equivalent crime be sent to the US military? Perhaps a criminal killer can be institutionalized and used as a resource for protection. 

• I believe crimes that do not include harm to another perhaps shouldn't be taken as serious as real crimes. Unless the person has potential of doing harm, I think they should be give a separate space then real criminals. For example, those who are incarcerated for smoking marijuana. 

• I question the idea if the United States will ever truly be a prosperous, free, peaceful, and virtuous nation. Having the United States take part in so much of the worlds affairs, will it never stop from other countries from disliking our presence? Do you think that perhaps if the United States adopted a new model and set a new example for admitting, explaining (with complete factual reasons in all honesty), and apologizing for our mistakes that we, the United States could show the world that there is humility, sincerity, honesty, and good intentions for the world that perhaps the world can see us in a more righteous way? Perhaps this is the true path to prosperity, peace, and human progress. 

• I write for no reason. I express my own ideas, beliefs, philosophy, and intellect. I find delight in it. It gives me purpose sometimes. I'm certain no ones really cares and that it will quickly be forgotten given the nature of blogging and the internet. Although, I should states that what I express isn't for anyone but for myself; however, I thought it would be a good idea to write it in a way for if other want to read it, they can. Maybe they can surprisingly learn to understand me. Or, maybe it's because I have a outrageous and insane thought that maybe some of my ideas can be used one day to change the world. Very unlikely. Maybe it's because I don't have others in which I can express my ideas with or posses a level of intellect capable of freely expressing my ideas. Maybe it's because of criticism or the fear of  being judged or that I'm shy or too much of an introvert. I write because it makes me feel free and artistic. I type the world and it comes alive in my mind. The true essences of a writer. However, I'm content. I hope to continue writing till the days there is nothing more to write about. Maybe I will be remembered. Maybe I will be forgotten. Who cares. It's the now that is relevant. Nevertheless, maybe by writing I will inspires others to write. Maybe one day they can come together in a rational way and open new the world to new ideas and possibilities. Until then, I would encourage everyone to write. Every life with an original opinion, belief, philosophy, and idea matters. Change is inspired though the intellect. The intellect produces the nature of humanity. 

• Those who want others to do things for them surely should appreciate initiative. 

• I am interested in the term intelligent idiot. The reason coined for his term is because there are many graduates that leave college simply to get a job. I wonder why this is. It strikes me odd they don't think about creating opportunity. Surely institutions in education teach their student how to think for themselves and how to be intellectual.

• Perhaps where there is no crime, there's likelihood to find virtue and prosperity. 

• A personally disagreeable idea I had but would still like to mention is if orphans should become part of the military. Perhaps a better idea would be to consider having orphans automatically enrolled in highly educated scientific institutions. 

• Neurological hazing is a definition I came up with when the utilization of mapping the complex networking of one's brain to use for advantage. 

• Even the perverted should be respectful. I also think it';s right that people should also respect the perverted. 

• Always be aware of what you are lead to believe.

• Be very aware of secret societies (secretive/ underground ideologically conditioned or cultured mobs), evil ideologies, false institutions/ organizations, dark secrets, counter intelligence measures, and controversial politics. In time, I believe all will eventually be exposed/ revealed. 

• Commonly competence may be lacking, however make no mistake that in times of controversiality and severity competence is extremely necessary, for those who do not obtain competence could find destruction, despair, and devastation. 

• The best student is yourself. It's good to make mistakes sometimes, it shows you have the humility to admit if your wrong, willing to seek the truth to understand, have the ability to learn, and the ability grow independently. 

• While watching Mr. Rogers, an old show from PBS I use to watch in the 90s as a child, I found it very humbling how a person can be so simple, humble, and good. I would love to see more shows like this today. His best quote: "Human Life is very deep and our modern dominant lifestyle is not."- Mister Rogers. 

•  I believe it is terrible to demean the value of another, in conversation and behavior. I believe people should talk to other people and behave in a manner that shows respect, dignity, politeness, and a sense of goodness with a message to lift the value and ego of another. There are ways in which people can talk to another over any subject, even if vulgar or painfully truthful, without hurting their ego/self esteem. Instead of demanding, suggest. Instead of forcing, state what one wishes to happen. Society is such a way nowadays where this form of polite, good, humble, and respectful communication is lost because of the instant tendency of being offended or affected by personal insecurities. I find the solution quite clear. Treat others how one wants to be treated. Talk with kindness, politeness, truth, goodness, and in a way that keep harmony and respect. Such examples are needed in today's society.

• I believe the personal sense to do good and to demonstrate ethics of goodness to another is the path to heaven. 

• I find the Japanese culture delightful and very honorific in tradition. It would be interesting for the western world to have equivalent values in terms of ethics because of how Japanese society can demonstrate such an ability to be morally and personally civilized, harmonious, respectful and good. I find the western world can be seen almost the exact opposite of Japan and perhaps other Asian counties. Nonetheless, if you examine cultural differences between the western world and that of Asia, one can find many similarities. I found a sense of ethics and human behavior and interaction seems to connect as goodness, kindness, and respect seem to be a universal human trait and desire. That is one reason I think Confucius's philosophy to have a personal desire to be good is the path for humanity. I believe doing good, without any reason other then the self, is the path to heaven. Furthermore, I believe it's important to state that although I find Japanese and Asian-Confucian ethics the way for humanity, I rather not have the western world become an extension of the eastern world; for even if the western world adopts these practices, it will still be culturally defined however with a more personal and hopefully social desire to have an ethically good mindset and behavior. 

• If one simply cannot tolerate another, such as if another is being unreasonable or if the situation cannot be helped, I find it best to shut another out, state no opinion, and be polite but to become distant in conversation with the use of silence. The lack of eye contact is another great way to distance oneself in conversation. If one is logical and does have reason, they should surly understand one's body language and realize what they're doing is perhaps wrong, unreasonable, or an overreach of their own behavior. In humility they should apologize as a form of humble practice and willingness to listen. 

• One should practice tolerance so that in the most stressful or aggravating times, one can maintain manner and respect while speaking their mind in a polite and civilized way but with worlds that have greater meaning; the deeper the words in meaning, the greater the power or severity in conversation.  

• To put one down is to show personal weakness in rationality, civility, and self image/representation. 

• I believe those who are truly wise and demonstrate a profound use of ethics should be held at the highest status of society. It's my belief that if one sees another who is greatly wise, it will inspire others to want to also become leaders. 

• I want to live with the idea that if one does good in life, life will reward them back either on Earth or in heaven. 

• I think everyone should develop the ability to always understand how a person feels. I believe the best way a person can apply this by putting themselves selves in another's situation. 

• Everyone should make everyone feel welcomed, special, and carefree when being spoken too. Also, talking about one's deepest sentiments or deep sensitive thoughts can be a good basis for a good relationship.

• A crazy idea, wouldn't it be interesting to give homeless people the resources to become an independent journalist and earn a living this way? Perhaps intensive them to visit their local library or have a private area in the local library to read and learn. Maybe another good idea would be to give them a place to peruse private education. 

• What is the true hidden secret of that which is not known? What is the nature of the secret and why is it? Why do we believe what we believe? What makes it truth? What is the way to become a path for good, serenity, virtue, and prosperity? I believe in what is good, is truth; in what is good is absolute. 

• I believe good will always triumph over evil; and as long there is evil there is justice and understanding. Evil is to mud as good is to rain, as long as it rains the mud will always be washed away. The nature of good is like this. I will add the solution to evil, regardless of how evil, is compassion. Where there is compassion, there is peace. Where there is peace, virtue. 

• The time for humanity has always been limited, unless humanity does harm to itself as shown throughout history, the vessel in which humanity lives on will also one day come to end. If a nature of collectivness is not created by then, humanity will eventually and suddenly cease to exist. 

• Full freedom is the nature of humanity; morality is humanity's natural law; serenity is the result of good; civility leads prosperity likewise compassion drives virtue. This is part of a compass to which humanity can achieve greatness and endeavor. 

• The human race can be a family as the universe can be a neighborhood. 

• The removal of freedom or free will eventually leads to an overflow of intellects and natural order, perhaps to which nothing can prevent or keep from sustaining. I believe good is the nature of human progress and reasoning. That which is good, is nature. That which is not good is misguidance. All evil and wrong doing is misguidance and is without a doubt unsustainable. 

• The truth will set you free. How so this is, especially in one's final moments. 

• Nature itself is not evil. However, the nature of freewill can be evil if one does not establish balance and self-moral judgment to do good and what is right. 

• I believe nature is not evil because it follows the life-cycle to survive. There often seems to be some sort of balance. I wonder if an animal never had to eat, would it purposely seek to do harm to another animal? I believe freewill gives the feedom to choose if it wants to harm another or not. It depends on how we choose to use our freewill. Because of this I believe it can lead to evil or good. Therefore, the world needs examples of good so that a culture of good can be established. A culture of good can condition the world to be a peaceful place. 

• Through the realization of truth, one can examine one's own current and past evils. I think if such a feeling is strong and burdening, it could be that there is still a desire to do good. I would imagine this individual would desires a life of no burdens and damnation. In self-truth, one could find themselves admitting one's own faults and past evils. To such sins and burdens, I believe the best way to find forgiveness and redemption of oneself and that of others is to give back from the destruction one has caused. One can also take back from that which burdens them by offering themselves to do services of good or justice. 

• What are you doing? Why are you here? Are you doing good or evil? Is this something you want? How do you feel about doing what you are doing? Can you see yourself through anothers perspective? Why would you do what you are doing? What has lead you to be doing what you are doing? If you had a choice to continue doing what you are doing, would you? What would happen if you did something else instead, something you wanted? What about the right thing? Could you do the right thing? Is it possible to put you emotions and beliefs aside for change to do the right thing? What if you are wrong? What is the truth? I believe anyone can change if they seek truth or if they see the overall picture. I believe if they see the good in the world, they will stop doing evil. I think they can be a force of change and of example. I believe all should be a force of change and example for others to do good, not just for the world but for themselves. 

• I don't care much for politics; however, since I think the most damage to the United States can be from the inside, perhaps Government officials should be trialed differently. For example, they perhaps should be trialed using a method like guilty until proven innocent, instead of innocent until proven guilty. I wonder if this is a good idea, because these individuals are are in a position of utmost unstable powers. 

• I think a good idea is to have a known and publicized document that reflects public interest for government leaders to follow. 

• I believe there should be complete exposure of the Unites States funding matrix and to follow the line of cash to the source of funding. I believe there should be a full investigation to how the money is being used and what are the leaders intentions. Not only the money should be traced in present times, it should also be traced throughout history holding prior companies accountable and to pay back what's due. I also believe it's important to understand the ideology and systems put in forth by these organizations. If money has been taken by unlawful, then these organizations should be trialed and return the money to those it has taken it from. 

• Another idea for or current government is for those proposing new funding project should show complete use of the how they are going to spend funding. Money should never be wasted, it should be completely transparent, looked at by the public, and used to do good and proven or somehow tested it will do good. I believe the government should be so transparent that a simple small business owner could look at the governments finances and manage it. 

• Perhaps a new kind of scientific subject can be created called Government Analytical and Science or "G.A.S.". This is the monitoring of government status, statistics, and progress. It can be used to study government and it's behaviors. It can also be used to monitor changes in structures, ideology, philosophy, funding, and political movements as well as influences, affiliations, and progressions. 

• I believe a government can be monitored for corruption by examining data. I think if it looks at the general data of the amount of scandals that has risen through the years, how it came to be, where it came from, and the direction it was heading, and how people are satisfied or dissatisfied with overall outcome of the government. The data can reflect the overall health of the government or if it is in the process of evolving into something less desirable. I would call this method of analysis the Government Health Statistics or "G.H.S. Analysis". I would also call the result of the data being represented MCA which stands for Monitoring Corruption Analysis in which the data represents can be used to monitor and provide an overview of the changes in political culture. 

•  According to counter intelligence officials in a documentary, the notion of "Admit nothing, deny everything, and make counter accusations" should be publicly known and those being investigated should be called out for doing such. I believe there should be a court type where the defendant should only be allowed to say either yes or no without anything specific discussed for security reasons. If they lie, they are accountable for their actions. If they are truthful, they shouldn't have anything to worry. Nevertheless, I also believe they should also be discretely monitored by body language experts and lie detection personal. Because it is government and has the ability to change the very fabric of a nation, heavy security should also be mandatory within the government. 

• I believe the religious institutions to which the country was founded on should also have a voice in politics. It should be up to them to state what is right, what is wrong, and what is the right way to do something. 

• I could be mistaken; however, i think people should be aware of  private military forces, because a military for hire could pose vast significant risk as it is undetectable and could have more training than the greatest of special forces. I think this force can be used to carry out objectives beyond the jurisdiction of morality. Perhaps a conspiratorial idea could be an invasion or an assault posing as something they are not and working for a client of extremely dangerous or insane intent. 

• It is never wise to propagate or enforce things we don't fully understand. Misconception comes from that we don't understand. 

• Excuses are inexcusable to the guilty mind for that which is evil should always be unjustifiable and unnecessary. Once guilty, no excuses can hide from truths. 

• I think a form of control or psychological control can be easily created by the use of fake debt. One can be tricked into feeling guilty with a debt in which isn't truly real however seems real by twisting reality. It's a very effective mob tactic that can be used to give justification to violence. 

• Where there is evil, perhaps there is always sadness.  

• I had the thought to never fear what one doesn't understand but instead become curious. The more one knows about something, the more it becomes less scary, more clear, and  familiar. 

• Game Design: I think there are two types of game design processes, structured and unstructured/dynamic. Structured is to access analysis, statistics, demographics, and player behavior where unstructured/dynamic is adding concepts, content, and ideas related to what designers freely think would be fun and exciting using many theoretical possibilities. An example of a structured game can be Battlefield 4 compared to an unstructured/dynamic process such as Half Life episode 2. 

• Absurd unscientific hypothesis: I don't believe in this but I thought I'd state the idea. Could it be the souls is exactly consciousness. What if it is this that transcends to a higher dimension of existence.

• Absurd unscientific hypothesis: Just like the previous idea, what if consciousness was capable of the supernatural. An outrageously crazy idea would be what if people, through their consciousness, could  travel to alternate dimensions; as if trading their consciousness with themselves in another dimension. That would make for a awesome story idea. 

• Another outrageous thought: What if we were constantly passing though, or often subject to passing through different dimensions/ alternate universes from time to time. For example: what if in this timeline you were suppose to be a millionaire but somehow ended up incarcerated because of a martial law takeover. I wonder if such an idea could exist. 

• I think everyone should be generous and kind. I would think being generous and kind could be mistaken for being a push over or having no backbone. I can only hope that this is not ever mistake, and if it is i think it's in one's greatest moral standing to politely correct another. 

• (maybe) Could it be that morals (the understanding of what is right and wrong) should be self taught. I'm sure if everyone did it, they could be socially conditioned; however, if they were not taught morals and were allowed to make mistakes, perhaps they would be even more wise and to learn for themselves the important of morality. 

• (maybe) Could it be a good way to teach or condition others to be a leader by physically conditioning them through various scenarios to which they have to think for themselves could be a good way to learn? I suppose an example could be giving a person the opportunity for field testing in a subject and having them make all the mistakes they want and after they are taken out from the field test, they could be taught the actual subject. I believe this created interest and drive to learn something. Another thought could be: what if you were given chemicals (safe chemicals for the most part) and taught to mix them to see what reaction a person could come up with. I believe after they are finished creating an interesting chemical reaction, they will naturally gain interest to want to learn for themselves. Kind of like showing off magic at Hogwarts. If a person sees something interesting, they will have the natural urge to want to learn more or perhaps even become an expert in the subject so that they can do more with what they know. 

• I believe one should never blame or tell someone they are something, because it's a step of personal moral boundaries. It's as if saying indirectly one knows better than another. Everyone is different and should not subscribe to the same as another. Everyone should learn to be themselves and be appreciated or welcomed to be themselves. 

• I think everyone should be equal but respected for their status/position/profession/expertise/experience in society (a teenager has the same equal/ mutuality as a CEO); even people in higher positions/status should act/behave as if they are equal. I believe those in political positions or position in which has potential control of others, they should show greater leadership in ethics, moral, and wisdom. 

• Luxury idea: I think it would be cool to have many groups looking for people with interesting ideas who are willing to help and forfil their ideas for no real reason. 

• Think what you can today for maybe tomorrow no one will. 

• I believe a good practice is mending relationships, especially after they are subjected to scrutiny, temperaments, or distance. 

• I think it's possible to live in a world where enemies can also be rational; like being enemies but still having respect for each other. 

• I believe one should stop themselves from doing evil. I think to do this one should have self discipline, self-moderation, remain rational, and have consideration for others. 

• Political idea: I call it the Tri-lifewall Safety Net System. The Tri-lifewall Safety Net System is an idea where if a person runs completely out of money and ends up on the street, they have three chances to get back on their feet. The system works by having a pool of money made for people who are completely homeless.  After a person becomes completely homeless and signs up for the system, they are given $10,000 to try again at life. Keep in mind a person only has three chances. The money is also not subjected to being taxed. After receiving the $10,000, it will take a person three months to recover another chance of getting their next chance to sign up after they go homeless again. However, to apply a person must do an in-person drug test. If there are any drugs or it's found the person drink excessively, they are denied this service. Instead they will have to go through drug rehabilitation for a chance to be given this service. The Tri-lifewall Safety Net System is design for individuals who are guaranteed to pick themselves back up and push themselves to become someone once again. 

• I think socialism can be a very functional form of government; however, seeing the United State's political patterns (such as patterns of "leadership"), historic corruptions/ scandals, proceeding agendas, economic projections, global outlook, and even scriptural analysis, I calculate that if the United States were to become socialist, it would without a doubt be the most devastating event in United States history. 

• If the United States were to join a globalist government system, it would more than likely also be extremely devastating because of the over weighted variables and outcomes of not just a single nation, but a collage of nations resulting in tyrannical action. Although a globalist system can be doable and perhaps be a good idea in the distant future, if it becomes a system free of corruptions, secrecy, and potential takeover by unseen entities, it's not a good idea for the current state in time because how it can easily be subjected to corruptions, manipulations, and tyrannical takeover. If a globalist system were to exist, there would need to be perfections because a single flaw can affect the entire world. In such a case it would be better to remain as nations. 

• Evil is not only where the money is at, it is also where the power is at. 

• Could it be possible, that not all of history is revealed or is truth? If so, how can we find out? How can we find out history isn't manufactured as a product of institution? 

• I believe people should have perhaps more regard for nature and what is natural. Maybe one day old places that pose no historical value can be brought down and natural forestry reserves can be created. Another idea would be to allow for the top of buildings to grow plant life. I am most certain nature and humanity can find balance. 

• Evil for the purpose of good is still evil; for good there is always a rational solution. 

• Politics: I think there should be an investigation and examination for political corruption in elections, such as examining and investigating electoral machines and equipment, the election processes, perhaps where candidates get their funding, what societies (or secret societies) they belong to, and what are their true backgrounds.

• I think the greatest threat to modern time are not just tyrants or out of control governments but also the influences of organized mobs, destructive global elites, potentially power hungry global bankers, secret societies, powerful cults, and irrational ideologies. I suppose the real question is what can be done to stop such a potential destructive force. 

• I think perhaps conspiracy should be a subject of study because it can include deductions and reasoning, discovery of truth, questioning the means, and at the least an expansion of imagination. 

• In times of despair, a hero should always emerge to do the right things, even if the threat is greater than themselves. For those that fail to recognize the situation, they are innocent but respectfully also at fault. For those that recognize the problem and do nothing, they are most at fault. For those who recognize the situation and act, they should be heros. Surely even whistle blowers should be admired for desiring to do the right thing. All acts for the greatest intention should be respected. The world need average and real heros who put their lives aside for others. A simple act of heroism, should reflect the very nature of what is good. 

• Perhaps there should be a system to identify those with good intentions and those with evil intentions. 

• I question if such a system can exist where there is an overall democratic system but with a reasonable individualistic system for people to do what they want or live a certain lifestyle without being criticized.

•  I wonder if it's possible there could be an organization for the purpose of a chaotic ideology that conditions it's members to desire to do evil. Imagine the possibility of that entity amassing and having the ability to put its members in greater positions of power by other members of the organization. Imagine how they could use such a power for exploitation. If such an organization were to grow powerful and have the ability to insert it's members into position of devastating global power how would one stop them? 

• I personally think secret societies are the places in which evil conditioning can be done. If the world becomes chaotic, perhaps we can learn from this and do the same perhaps without the need for conditioning. 

• I wonder if it's possible that the same shady entity behind Nazi Germany is still alive or perhaps have already conditioned members and have placed them into positions of political power today. The idea illustrates what seems to be a repeated pattern in history. The pattern in which an ideology or belief to bring power through terror is born and grandfathered through the ages gaining more power, if not in secret, to carry out it's agendas. Perhaps if such a patter continues, how can the spread of such dangers be stopped? Is there a way to place a plan ahead of time for them to be instantly exposed and to have proof of their evils in a secret and silent coordinated masterpiece to which hold power through justice? 

•  Perhaps there should be a law regarding the influence of secret societies in positions of power. 

• Perhaps if the source of a devastating ideology is found and brought to justice, the rest of the ideology will falter. In worst case scenarios a hierarchy is put in place and an elimination will need to be done starting from the top and worked its way to the bottom. 

• A wild and crazy idea I thought about, due to religion, would be to place relics of protection in places of potential evil. Such as an image of St. Michel the archangel, religious parchments, or the blessing of a priest with holy water.

• Another wild idea would be to get a collection of priests and go on a nation wide expedition around the entire United States blessing every major street and city. I'm not a religious person; however, I believe in the possibility, and seeing how such a positive influence can come of the church, perhaps this is what the nation can utilize. 

• Just as there can be an army of evil, there should be an army of good, even if it has to be shrouded in complete secrecy. 

• Those who are the most powerful may think they are all knowing; however, without wisdom, morals, and compassion, the most powerful minds are still as if the minds of children.  

• Because of the conspiracy of elites taking over the world by financial banks, maybe a good idea could be to establish a new currency that can be adapted by other countries which can be backed by value and has no influence or remain ignorant to existing global currencies. I think this is a good way to reset the economic stability for a nation and the world as current world currencies can be subjected to control by entities. Another way to bypass global currencies is to bypass using currencies all together and resort to a resource based economy or even the fundamental economy of a trade and barter system. 

• Perhaps in times of grand corruption and unimaginable debt, there should be a currency reset or change where states within a nation create its own currencies and use it to trade among other states. Moving a step further perhaps a year later, the nation can create a national currency to which it can also trade with in every state and the world . Each form of currency should remain ignorant to the previous currency which held to corruptions and debts.  

• I believe what is true is true, one shouldn't be forced to believe. Instead, I think it's with wisdom to respect that which is not known and to remain a skeptic unless proven undeniably true. 

• I don't believe blind faith is wisdom, but it's with wisdom to respect blind faith and to be open to that of the possibility. 

• In spiritually, evil needs a host to control or manipulate. Ethically, it's up to one to be responsible for their actions (and not to open themselves for a position of disaster). Scientifically hypothetical, it's one's ability to control their own behaviors unless one's mind is somehow tampered with (or conditioned). In conclusion evil is either a choice or a possible manipulation by force. It seems clear it is a psychological phenomenon that perhaps should be dealt with psychologically. 

• I believe money is a great motivator, but for some, their best work comes through their own set of motivations. 

• Generally speaking, I believe knowledge of a subject can come from two sources, that which is from institution and perhaps proven by science or that which is found for/by oneself. Generally speaking one is motivated by self-discovery where the other is already established. In most cases, I believe both the institution and individual study should be respectful of each other as there could have been items in institutionalized subjects that may have been overlapped, missed, and forsawn which could have been discovered by those who learn, experiment, and explore a subject for themselves. 

•  (maybe) Those who do or follow evil perhaps have no greater intellect or even self-relationship. I believe they are potentially limited in rational and civilized thinking. Perhaps there could be an exploit because of a potential lack in long term original innovation due to free thinking intellectual creativity.  

• To question is to think. To think is to learn. To learn is to question. 

• "I suppose according to conspiracy alien life has already been contacted, perhaps it's something people shouldn't completely rule out. I mean, it seems very much possible. Nonetheless, what if extraterrestrial life exists but in forms we can't currently examine. For example: what if there were entities of/in/from a different dimension, what if there was extraterrestrial life made up of an energy source and not biological, what if there was invisible extraterrestrial life (invisible for defensive purposes)? In general, perhaps we should consider the possibility that life could exist without utilizing biological properties or conditions found on Earth. I mean, it seems the purpose of an organism is to survive, do you think they would adopt different forms?" My copy pasta from the comments on "Why haven't we found alien life?" video by PBS digital studios. 

• I personally disregard the following of man but regard the teachings of man. I think all men are equal but very in respectability do to their positions of power and capabilities. 

• I respect and admire females for their ability to be extremely compassionate, caring (for themselves and others), kind, and in most cases beautiful beyond belief (in personality and appearance). Unfortunately, I find myself undesiring a female companion. It’s most unfortunate I perhaps find they can be a bit too irrational at times. I think it would be ignorant and disheartening to be personally considered homosexual or sexist. I simply don’t find them desirable. However, perhaps a day may come when someone proves my feelings wrong. If else, I might be the extremely rare case of a person who doesn’t care for lust, losing their virginity, and desiring a female companion. I guess it’s my nature to defy culture and all odds.

• Often I feel like I don’t belong on this planet even though I would love to be regarded as doing good or just favor for humanity.

• I imagine how it would be wonderful to be an interstellar explorer with an HD camera exploring, discovering, and documenting peaceful, extraterrestrial races and cultures.

• I imagine what it would feel like to be given advanced technology and to force the greatest evils of the world to stop their evil doing and perhaps bring them to appropriate justice and to instruct humanity what can be done to improve the quality of life throughout the world.

• Finding the right questions or ideas can sometimes be the most difficult part before finding a solution.

• If one can’t excel by themselves, then perhaps they need someone to help them (hold their hand) until they get use to the unfamiliar environment.

• I think American society can be too fast pace sometimes. I think this is why people overlook what’s beautiful. 

• I believe we should expand on money-free culture. Perhaps I could regard this as part of care-giving or charity culture. An example can be having the ability to go places by bike, car, or by foot without money and have a free place to stay, park, and the ability to find a place to eat.

• I believe there should be more importance on traveling/ hitchhiking culture without money.

• In Japan there is a local crab restaurant. They gather crabs from the sea and put them in a tank to remove mud. The crabs are kept there for weeks and picked when the time is right; however, the crabs that are very violent will be put back. The crabs choose when they are ready to give up and be eaten. I see a harmonious balance of that not of force buy of will. I wonder if this can be an example for something.

• I think frugal culture should be allowed. People should have the ability to stop working and to pack up and travel to nature whenever they want without having to spend money at all. I think a happy population is a population that has the flexibility to get away for as much time as they want whenever they want. That being said there should be accommodations for these people, such as free parking and maybe even free lodging. 

• Anyone can tell you what to do, but they more than likely won't give you the encouragement on what it takes to get there.

• (crazy outrageous idea) I'm not much into spirituality, however I would like to examine a new subject of study labeling it as conspiratorial spiritual theoretical science. My first question is if it's possible to expel demons without religion and using means of science. For example, what if there was a machine that could stimulate or affect the brain (maybe pineal or hypothalamus) in a treatment that could expel a demon. Perhaps since the possession is psychological, maybe there is a psychological tactic that can be used as a treatment to expel demons. If I could make an interesting idea as a result if demons were extractable, I wonder if it would be possible to collect them and store them in a secure facility for further study. Another idea could be to ship them out into space for no further harm to humanity. My final idea is to eliminate them completely; maybe using them as an energy source; assuming they won't posses a machine).

• If demons can posses people, can angels do the same for good or to destroy evil? 

• I don't agree with anarchism; however, I think perhaps we should let anarchists live the way they want. Perhaps they should be given a set location or locations (that is not expandable) to which they are free to live the way they want. I think maybe we can first test this idea to see what might come of it and if it's functionable or not. 

• I believe even in war, there should always be compassion for the enemy. 

• I think those who do evil should always and eventually serve justice. I'd like to think of justice of a condition equal to their crimes. 

• I regret buying an OUYA. 

• Do you think political leaders should be fully aware of conspiracies? 

• Supposedly, according to conspiracy, the New World Order members are made up of Luciferian-ideologic secret societies and cults with the purpose to condition themselves to believe they can become God. The fundamentals supposedly of a Lucifarian society is to invert scriptures of the bible saying the devil is the good guy. I wonder what it is that makes them so sure. If they have proof, then perhaps there can be an answer to the overall question of if there truly is a God, what is God, what really are evil forces, and ultimately why do we exist. It would be interesting and perhaps life altering or maybe even world changing to discover the truth. 

• I think one of the greatest challenges of being human is thinking in a way where one can choose the best option or even the most unseen or indirect option that produces the greatest long term results. Supposedly this way of thinking can be done through meditating. I personally am not much for meditation. I also think some people find it through the use of drugs; like aderol. If only there was a way to constantly think in this state or to produce some sort of technology that will allow us to practice to think in this manner. Maybe one day we can condition our mind to think beyond critically and beyond the minds of geniuses. 

• Listening to beautiful music, I can't help but tear up. The tears, they are just neurons in my brain. To me, they are so much more than neurons. What may seem average on the outside holds a world of meaning within. Because we give meaning, there is so much to life, to people, to the world. Sometimes our minds can't always comprehend. 

• One may think they are full knowledgeable about a subject; however, one should know there could be many interpretations resulting in a lack of knowledge. 

• (Outrageous idea) I wonder if it's possible for the planet, universe, or even dimension to be "sick/ill" or appear to have symptoms of an event that can alter or influence matter/time.

• (games) One thing I find all great games have in common is that they excite the emotion and imagination. I am convinced, less emotion, less player value.

• Regarding conspiracy and spirituality, could it be there are "demons" behind every paranormal super human ability; even if it's good or evil? Perhaps humans were never meant to have superhuman abilities. Or what if people were meant to steal powers from entities/ demons? If people took powers from entities/ demons, could this be an immoral act? Are there permanent consequences? 

• (strange idea) I wonder if a human can use his own spirit or consciousness to perform super human abilities without influences from any spiritual sources or influences. 

• (Game) I think originality makes a good game (this definitely includes gameplay as well). 

• What makes something believable? Is it attained from the value of results or reaction? Perhaps it's what is believable when it is proven objective in our reality (like feeling it and touching it) and not in our own minds. 

• Because something cannot be explained, we should not jump into irrational conclusion. There is always something rather than nothing, even if that something cannot be comprehended in current human understanding. For this it should be our interest to seek and to understand that we do not currently understand. Therefore, from what we don't understand should lead to curiosity, thus from curiosity to questions, from questions to theories, from theories to analysis/observation, and from analysis/observation to hypothesis, from hypothesis to further study seeking evidence and results, from evidence and results to conclusion which will lead to further understanding. 

• (maybe) I think there is a different understanding of freedom when it comes to socialism compared to a capitalist democrative-republic. It seems many people are lead to believe the freedom will be the same when with research I find it is a different "freedom". I believe the socialist version of freedom is a limited freedom; or a freedom with a cap. The reason I say this is because not only will it be easier to do nothing when allowing others to work for you, it's a freedom defined by it's authorities. Your freedom are actually limited to the desires of the leaders. I think this is the opposite of freedom; it is a granted freedom rather than an free-individualistic freedom. Many now-a-days are lead to believe capitalism is bad. I think such individuals have a lack in knowledge about their history. In a capitalist society, it's with certainty one has the freedom to achieve and fail. This is what it truly means to be free. I understand the idea of not having a base or safety net to fall back on or to live life in comfort; however, I think in a capitalist society, there is so much more room and opportunities to do greater than the conditions found in socialism. One of the ideas that makes capitalism and a democratic republic great is the ability to set fourth ideas to help others. Why use government when one can use charitable organizations. What if a person created the opportunity for a charitable market to help the homeless and those in poverty. Of course I believe for this to be done, people need to have an open and unregulated market with minimal regulations and involvement from government and banks. For those set on socialism, I think it's a wonderful and respectable opinion but such an idea, if truly desired, should be on a state level and not on a national level. I think it would be wrong to impose such a rule on those who do not desire it. I find it an ethical misconduct. I think with the expansion of micro economies on a state level, socialist-like plans can be created; that is if one is completely and irreversibly set on becoming socialist. 

• I would like to established a name for my own teaching of ethics, morals, and etiquettes. If I could call them something, I would like to call it: Stanley's Scientific Philosophy; Analytics and Principle of Propriety. 

• I think when a person refers to the soul, they are really referring to the conscious. 

• I think it's best to never judge someone if they are mental or not. This could cause the other person to feel insecure or introverted. It seems right to respect another and overlook any imperfections, because they may have talents others might only dream of having. 

• I think it's wise to question and find out how government (or perhaps private institutions) can or may influence or manipulate markets. 

• One of my favorite artist quotes: “I believe that in design, 30 percent dignity, 20 percent beauty and 50 percent absurdity are necessary,” - Shigeo Fukuda 

• If possible, I think sometimes it's necessary to step away from daily norms, practices, and subjects of interest and to do something spontaneous or random. 

• I think perhaps people shouldn't focus so much on money but what they are doing with the money. Money should be seen as a byproduct of what they are doing. That being said I think people should collaborate or be willing to work with others because of interesting ideas and experimentations without emphasis on stereotypes and judgments. 

• I think the United States should bring back manufacturing, even if the pay could be low. I'm sure those who live in extreme poverty could desire the work. In time, hopefully manufacturing can utilize innovation and invite other countries to do business with the United States where wages can eventually increase. Nonetheless, maybe in the meantime, the company can promise employees shares in the company. 

• I think there should be hospitals or clinics entirely runned entirely by donations. Even the medicines should be free. 

• I think it's possible that courage can come with wisdom if not knowledge. 

• While watching videos of the black box I have come to interesting insights and thoughts. 1. The world will end 2020 (not sure if that's true but we'll see). 2. I wonder why some spirits don't like Jesus. 3. Spirits seem to like and leave alone people who are nice to others. 4. Spirits can become angry when bothered. 5. Heaven's a physical place. 6. Spirits seem so obey people even when they torment a person by pressuring them to leave. 7. Some spirits seems attached to other malevolent entities. 8. Spirits seem to know what someone asks before they ask it. 9. Spirits seem everywhere but can amass at will when asked. 10. They seem to know a lot including detail about one's own life. 11. Entities can pop into existence anywhere and even attach themselves to walls. 12. Spirits can shapeshift. 13. Orbs are evil entities. 14. Many spirits are obsessed with the light and heaven. 15. They refer to the Bible as the help book. 16. Spirits always want help to find the light. 17. Some entities seem to be trolls or sound be very sarcastic. 18. Could it be Huff is popular in the spirit world?  19. Some spirits cannot remember their own name.

• There are a lot of similarities with the Tibet teachings of the passage of death and what seems to be reality of the afterlife. 

• Even with the existence of a spiritual world, perhaps we shouldn't let it consume our very realities. If it's possible to help, then it's perhaps good to help. If there are demons, then we should have preventative measures from demons influencing our world. However, I think we should ultimately leave the spirits alone in peace. 

• I believe as technologically advanced the western world is, they are still at the level of children when it comes to ethics, especially compassion. 

• I think it's a good idea to sell a device to track ones vehicle if not utilize tracking technology in new release models vehicles. 

• I think a great solution for if one is depressed is to rediscover themselves or try living with an alternative purpose or a new identity. 

• I think it's a good practice to appreciate what one has for whenever they lose it, they do not get angry but appreciate the purpose or the benefits of having it.

• Greed, or specifically the ability to step on people for personal gain, seems to be by far the most powerful of inner demons I have seen so far.

• Being an introvert I found it actually helpful and productive to get out of my comfort and even  embarrass myself once in a while. My personal feeling of insecurities seem to be put aside allowing me to feel more open and expressive. 

• I think donations should be dept free and homeless people should have a crowdfunding source to help their purposes. 

• (meh) In the end death comes for us all and we are left searching for the light. 

• I've seen how cruel this world can be, perhaps this is the true nature of humanity, one of my greatest dreams would have been to change the world and to make it into a place that accepts everyone for who they are, where people live to be prosperous, good, and virtuous; where social harmony is among the greatest values. ... Perhaps this very idea was a mistake. Human nature is to be seen idealistically good when malicious desire is at it's unshakable core. Can it helped? I'm beginning to believe it cannot be helped. The idea to change the world and better human-kind is probably a mistake. A common ideology that never is put into action and achieved. The core of humanity is probably survival and a race for power. 

• (meh) I question why demons constantly attack when it seems angels are never around. 

• (meh) If I can't smile in my era of living on Earth perhaps I can make it for future generations to smile. 

• Everyone fails to see why people are the way they are, the psychology of why they aren't happy, why they are bitter, and non-caring or social. I think it's important to look into the psychology of criminals, those who commit fraud, are ruled by greed, and those who commit suicide. If you discover the psycholological reasons, what you'll find is a system of suppression. I believe this to be made by design by people in higher powers or the result of people and systems who control the lives of others. I can see the evidence of such characteristics as animal stuck in the zoo compared to those free in nature. 

• I profess a new study, a study of the attitude and emotional values of people in high economic times compared to economic times of stress. 

• I believe there are many more variables that science doesn't measure or consider because of the inability to calculate all values of human perception. Perhaps it's because of this it is wrong to impose a system to which affects or controls everyone's lives. My own personal example I think of is if there is only one way to do something, such as using credit, then there is a limitation. I now have the psychological interpretation that I have to conform to something I don't value thus giving me the feeling of being restricted (as discussed previously, I don't believe in debt, I rather save money)

• I question why when people are nice, others walk all over them.

• I want to try and always look past the anger and identify what it is a person is truly angry about. To find and consider the source of anger, I think could lead to a rational solution.  

• If the source of anger is ideology, is it because of a lack in education or the inability to think for oneself? 

• I find it interesting yet sad how some of the greatest minds, like Nicolas Tesla for example, died alone and without any money.  

• If there is an afterlife how will a spirit obtain justice if they are murdered? Regarding Judaic-based religion, is it up to the lord to provide with justice? Should they obtain some sort of justice in our living-reality?

• I highly disagree with this but I wonder if when a country is virtuous it becomes a collective society and when it's the opposite, it's an individualistic society. 

•  I wonder what makes a society feel pleasant and warm and what makes a society feel bitter and cold. 

• There is no harmony in fighting. Solutions can come in different forms. 

• When angry, know why, because hatred is infectious.  

• In the western world there seems to be many that disregard the desire to become wise. There's more focus on worldy values and personal egos. I think wisdom, and knowledge for that fact, is a person's greatest treasure. 

• I see why people in other parts of the world remain quiet in an argument. I feel there are very knowledgeable and civilized because they know it is unwise to speak irresponsibly, judge others, or speak on behaves of known personal faults.

• Who is a person to talk bad about another. Obviously this creates conflict. I think it's truly out of good judgment to tell someone their faults because they care; however, to do so by putting them down, I think is irrational. One should uplift others even if others are wrong. 

• I think even when we are around that person one dislikes, the subconscious mind acts unconsciously.

• Is the conflict truly resolved even after finding solution? Because of the feeling to obtain resolution (this can include: doing it a person's way, not wanting to be seen a wrong, or having the desire for more attention), I think  conflict builds without actually going away. I think it's important to keep harmony and consideration of feelings for others.

• I think it's important that every child knows that everything they see in the world, they can also design, build, innovate, or grow. 

• They say everything happens for a reason. Literally this is true, metaphorically I disagree. But that's just my opinion. 

• I believe the truth should be said with the highest regard of civility and rationality. 

• When there is confrontation, I found being silent to be the finest solution. There can be repercussions, however the silence shows proof of one's civility and rationality. 

• It's in good nature to guide, however in guiding not to control. 

• Accept a person for who they are, even if they are truly the worst person on the face of the Earth. Nobody can change a person but the person themselves.

• I believe all man is equal. Moreover, it's my hypothetical belief that if God were to come to Earth that I also would see him as equal, even if he were to be a higher being. I agree we should grant respect and appreciation for having created humanity, but not to be taken into submission for the cause. Instead, we should treat him as family with the highest status of respect.

• My unexplained metaphorical hypothesis: evil and good fight with each other constantly. Naturally one wants to be either good or evil. Fighting is to go against or resist nature. However, the one who is neutral can find resolution or balance between the two. The one who is neutral does not fight but merges finding a balance with good and evil becoming truly neutral to which is nonresistant and transparent to fighting or going against nature. The relevance to this I think cannot be proven or even made clear with the average human understanding.

• I wonder if there will ever be hovering structures such as airports or facilities in the nearby future. 

• After my investigation with the Codex Gigas and upon further thoughts about biblical texts and deductions of the afterlife, I have concluded what I believe is possibly a secret to the bible that could perhaps provide with the average human-being the ability to perform supernatural feats. This secret is conjuration. The ability to call upon entities and ask or demand them to perform impossible feats. I hypothesize one can even control the actions of a malicious entities by calling God or a powerful entity of good to control them. In times of great need, such as need for protection or in times of illness, perhaps one can announce they need a loving and peaceful spirit to heal them or protect them. Furthermore, if such a secret is true, then I believe it would be wise to call God or Michel the archangel to ensure any malicious entity does not remain after a conjuration. 

• Be one in many worlds. Perhaps for example, when a student, be a student. When a teacher, be a teacher. However, in both, be both. 

• With talent comes great responsibility. It's good practice to help the little guy or those who can use some help. 

• According to Actualized.org wealth is value. Perhaps the more value one can create, the more opportunity to create wealth. I think it's also a good idea to be sure to create something remarkable. 

• I believe perhaps there should be measures, processes, or systems in place by companies or banks to ensure fraud is tracked, secured, hold the source accountable until lawful, and seek the development of functional and practical alternatives. An example can be a system or a process to securely deposit and receive checks and prevent bad checks or hold the source reliable for a bad check. Currency is the means of which everyone in a nation lives on, I believe it is wise to protect, provide security, and make practical to ensure individual progress and the progress of a nation as a whole. 

• I would think in the dawn of civilization it would be common knowledge to try and get everyone to have a peaceful and harmonious coexistence. 

• I believe we should return to a true free market economy. If one believe we are currently in a free market economy, they perhaps should research the real fundamentals of a free market economy. I have concluded the fundamentals of a free market economy taught today are not the same compared to the original concepts taught in the past.

• Do you think it would be fare that if it turns out the US government is behind 911 and perhaps the even greater idea that the conspiratorial downfall of modern America that involved every politician, news media station, college and university associate, individual of power that endorsed these condition that were perhaps paid or held job hostage should be held in trialed, fined, return their financial contributions, or punished by law because of their contribution to such a possible conspiracy? If I may state this again in a different way, should anyone who has contributed to the political cause leading to the downfall of America be trialed, fined, return their financial contribution, or punished by law?  

• I think it's in good practice not believe anything 100%. I also find it good practice to state sources and to address where my evaluations come from or if they are based on what I feel or believe. I think citing sources this way, always leaving room for correction, and never leave an entry to be surprised if i'm in a position of stating something nonfactual, I think leaves to a more accurate use of stating facts and allowing others to seek the truth for themselves. 

•  Since there are so many things involved politically that can be subject to corruptions, perhaps we should make the additional effort to adding provisions to which cannot be manipulated politically or become subject to corruption.  Maybe we can introduce the idea to make a system of red flags within regulations, laws, and legislation in case something is broken by the bureaucrats that run the system. I perhaps would like to add the idea that we should maybe add a system to which records red flags that automatically addresses public awareness. For example: Perhaps a system can be in place to where a red flag is put up and on display on political news networks that someone in Washington has ordered the mass transit of military equipment by rail to other states in the US or that a specific individual in Washington ordered the US border patrol to conduct routine checkpoints. Another good idea would be to create a system to which addresses all critical decisions in Washington such as a public relation or press that a new legislation is being passed and instantly made public for people to debate it. 

• I think we should respect everyone, even if they are deceiving and wrong. We should cater to our opinions instead of the opinions of others. 

• I think perhaps it's only right to respect the ways of life of others, even if we find it to be wrong or immoral. A controversial example is to respect the prostitute. It's with good character to politely inform him or her what she's doing is immoral; however, if it's their choice than I think it's only right to respect it, because although we may think it's wrong, there can still be good that can come from it. I think it's with good character to inform and to say what we think is right, but not to impose and force our judgment or an action of change, because of our own personal belief. I believe because their life doesn't effect our own, we should respect their decisions. Instead we should embrace them as a human being and treat them as we would treat our-self. Using this as an example, I believe the prostitute can represent anyone we might find controversial and that we can embrace them and have them as a respectable friend (perhaps ethics and etiquette is necessarily to help establish a sense of humility, community, innocence, or a mutual respect to avoid irrational influence and behavior). 

• I ask myself if hatred can be conditioned? If so how can it be stopped? I think the answer lies in education and the ability to think openly/ be self conscious. 

• I would like to create the term"True Justice", which is justice not by definition of law, but justice for the idea of what an unbiased society believes is fair, commonsense, which utilizing logic and reasoning (perhaps additionally through the perspective of ethics and philosophy). 

• I believe there are many layers to humanity. Layers that are apparent; some not so apparent; and some we'll never know about through average human perceptions. Perhaps an example can be looking at a plant; we acknowledge it's existence an perhaps how beautiful it looks; however, perhaps we don't consider the influences/affects it has had on the soil/ nature around it, the beauty it caters to with the overall environment around it, or even what special properties the flower may secretly hide. I can even go the extra mile and to state how it could have even  inspired someone's art or make them feel happy. There may even be thousands of the same plant on a field, but to that plant, it has it's own place and a place in the greater picture of that we may not see. 

• Although I ignore it, I dislike the use of words used to silence opinions or what people believe. I think everyone should say what they like and ignore that which they don't like. It out of respect, civility, and humility they should allow others to state their opinions. I also believe people should think for-themselves and believe what they think is right and what they believe. Perhaps part of civility is considering each other's perspectives and seek or have the ability to seek the truth for themselves. 

• (metaphor) To follow another is to follow their footsteps. Unknowingly these footsteps could lead off a cliff regardless how certain or strong the footsteps are. I think it's best for every person to comprehend each other's footsteps, but to create footsteps of their own. 

• I strongly believe life is about being good, doing right, and choosing to help others. Even though a person find them-self in great dissatisfaction of their own life, I believe they still have the chance to change, become humble, do good, seek forgiveness, and help others. It may sound like complete BS but in time you will forgive yourself, grow, and become more strong in your mind, senses, and body. I believe this can create more influence to others who are also lost, allowing more people to make the same transformation. I'm sure body wants to remain in a life state or state of mind which is static where they feel miserable while life is passing them by. I also believe part of helping is find ways to get people to get out of this state of mind or cycle of self loathing/ pity and to help them get farther in mind, body, and spirit. 

• I often ask the question how can a civilization prosper while defeating evils around them and of it's own. It's my belief the answer is in the personal sense of ethics and perhaps Confucianistic teachings. I believe if people can think for themselves (willing to find the fact themselves and considering another opinion but not automatically believing other instantly) and develop a sense of wanting to do good for themselves, for the next generation, or with a belief of reward in the afterlife, I believe people can develop a sense of rational thinking and common sense to where one person leading to many as a whole can keep the ethics and mindsets needed to keep their own civilization, healthy, prosperous, and harmonious. Perhaps a utopia can be more achievable with people willing to be civilized, rational, and harmonious, and perhaps logical (logic varies around the world). 

• I found after looking at conspiracy and learning everything to understand about the paranormal, afterlife, aliens, shadow governments, and even crazy nonfactual information (possibly made by people in a mental institution [good example: TimeCube]), I found myself more at peace and hungrier than ever for information not knowing where it will lead me. Whenever I hear something new, there a little spark of interest inside me that instantly wants to go home and research. After taking in so much controversial/ conspiracy information, whenever I come across a new conspiracy/controversial topic, I can instantly correlate/ reference it with other materials I already know, know where to research the facts, and can even use deduction and reasoning to see how something could be factual or nonfactual. Of course, as stated previously, I use the one foot in, one foot out method that helps me keep my sanity. I think for the average mind it's very easy to become overwhelmed, maybe terrified, feel the need to take action, or develop an irrational ideology. I believe the process of taking in information and having the patience and discipline to listen, read, and watch without reaction is important. Now, I find myself in a cycle of being very interested in things I want to know more of, but at the same time at a standstill because of a lack of excitement and at a bland state of being unphased/ unsuprised, even if the controversial material is meant to be beyond terrifying. Perhaps this is also the reason why I seemed to be unphased by horror movies or even heavy uncensored real-world events; although I wouldn't go as far to say I have become desensitized or find a irrational fascination in such things. Although, I perhaps found knowing too much to have captured my feel for excitement or to be surprised, I'm sure if I was in the middle of the action I would probably have a different behavior. I also found that there has been a shift in my desire for the paranormal and conspiracy to the average sciences and human knowledge. I found myself unbelievably fascinated when I got my hands on a book of micro-biology. I pop the book open from time to time whenever I have a question (for example how to think up a way to cure cancer [which supposedly has been done nonpublicized by the media in western countries with in South Korea through the use of magnets]). Perhaps since I've exhausted the motivation to know more about the paranormal, I have somehow grown a fascination with the unusually comprehensive material-heavy understandings of science to which I hope to one day learn as much as I can for the sake of simply knowing information out of sheer fascination. 

• It's my belief not everything needs a purpose or a reason. Somethings can have a meaning without any meaning at all. I remember the movie The Life of Pi saying something about this. I want to think maybe this can be something in everyone's lives where they see something they cannot explain but respect it, even if it doesn't produce any results or emotions. Perhaps art has portrayed this idea in hard to explain ways. 

•  I had an idea to perhaps allow for seminars or public speaking services/ events to teach people to do good, how they can help the community, and how they can strengthen their families. I think ideas such as these could unite and strengthen communities as well as families. If people teach examples of doing good, perhaps the response could create a culture of unity and to help each other. Perhaps even science can provide insight and information on functional and healthy psychology or sociology practices and behaviors.  

• I'm sure there will be times when common sense or logic conflicts with civility or rationality. In such a case perhaps common sense and logic should prioritized (keep in mind rationality and civility try and be maintained)

• Being that the U.S. has the right to bear arms, it seems logical for others to be somewhat afraid of each other. I think the right to bear arms is valuable in this country because of history, self protection, and defense, but unfortunately misused by mainstream cultural mindsets. I think all weapons, moreover fire arms should have more of a culture of respect and proper civilized use. I think those who misuse or don't take the weapon seriously shouldn't have one. I think a culture of respect for firearms should be created and all who own a firearm should abide by such honorable/chivalrous but unenforced code. I also had the thought that it would be interesting if people got along well with each other to the point guns are rarely used if not used at all in any conflict. Instead guns can be seen as more for entertainment or if needed protection from nature. 

• I found myself continued to be amazed by Japanese police. Polite, pacient, and so much more. I had the chance to look at their training and found it to be not too militaristic. I think the reason the police in some areas of the United States seems very brutal, scary, perhaps corrupt, and sadly misinterpret the law, is because of their lack of proper training and more values on discipline or having a militaristic mindset and not that of doing their job with personal protection or protection of the other individual. I think police should also focus on the good they are doing and being properly awarded and appreciated for the efforts of service. I believe the more they do good in their service the more they should be rewarded. This is the culture I think a police force should have. In addition, I also think there should be a way to where they can get rid of personal corruptions within the force without being known. A healthy force is one that is not subject to agendas and corruptions coming from the top. 

• In cultures, I would be very aware of death cults and dangerous secret societies. I would suggest to make death cults and secret societies that physically harm or can become ina position to physically harm others completely illegal. 

• I think we should all help and protect everyone. Controversially, I think we should prioritize and help and protect those who are the most humble and show the greatest sense of humility. The reason I think this is because is perhaps because of the idea that in western society, everyone wants to be helped first. A good way to make people humble could be through their desire to want to be helped first. 

• I find it helpful in many cases (in general) to not see a circumstance in black and white but in the mindset to examine everything from multiple angles and perspectives. Perhaps this is similar with deduction and reasoning (which I believe comes from criminology which comes from psychology). For example: a crime has been committed, what is the possible criminals excuse, could there be drugs or substance abuse involved, is there a lover involved, is there money involved, what is the person's mental state, how could they be stressed, what is their history, how would you react in their shoes; on the victim's side, how would you feel, what is their history, are they truly innocent, do they have ties with the criminal, is there money involved, what behaviors could elicit a reaction...etc. These are a few examples of looking at something from multiple angles. No stone left unturned, I will even include the possibility for the unusual and unordinary. 

• I have observed believers of different faiths. More specifically people who are radical. I continue to ask the question. How can people behave or justify behaviors according to their beliefs? I can understand the justification of becoming counter culture and choosing a non-average lifestyle, but how can someone find it within themselves to justify behaviors that in my opinion can be justified as complete irrational or perhaps uncivilized because of who or the way they believe. Looking at it from their angle: could it be passion; a desired vision for a way of social life to which they believe will improve the quality of life; could it be a hidden desire for wealth, power, or control? Or, could it be a psychological issue, the result of drugs or substance influence, or perhaps, in consideration of that which can't be explained, they had something happen to them that truly couldn't be explained. From most of which I researched it seems the fundamental desire of a religion is peace and spiritual guidance. Radicalization of a religion seems to not fulfill the religion's intended purpose. Therefore, does this make radicals hypocrites; achieving the outcome of their religion through their own desired means (perhaps through force); or perhaps using religion for personal desires? I am uncertain but shall continue to think about this. 

• People say things can't make you happy. I say things can make you happy or cater to your happiness, if you truly appreciate it. 

• Looking at the United States as a whole, I can definitely see how people can see it as a machine (or even a political machine). Whether it is or not or soon to be is uncertain. 

• I wonder why it seems it's not in societies nature to make an environment that is harmonious for each other. Surely it caters to a societies well being and prosperity. 

• It seems there is limited what I think I'll call "Free-Form Civil Lifestyles" (which are lifestyles that are different in survival and nature). Although this is a generalization and may not be accurate, I find it interesting to have an attempt to subjectify a thesis. If I may list two or three examples: I think I would say there is the civilian model, homeless model, and farming model. The civilian model is the most common and used model which is the obtaining of currency. The homeless model is the general model of scavenging for survival. The farming model is the model which one survives with or possibly without currency but lives off what the land provides. I'm sure there are many more other people can create; however, the point I waned to point out is I wonder if it's possible to create more of what i would like to consider Free-Form Lifestyles that cater to different methods and models for survival. Perhaps some new models do not include the use of currency but perhaps alternate economic systems. For example: the use of trade (like in native tribes), perhaps a model can be adopted which makes this economic system more mainstream in perhaps local areas. Another system could perhaps utilize Jacque Fresco's resource based economy system, which is utilizing resources as an economic system, rendering currency unnecessary.  Another idea could be the return of gold and mineral trade where the use of tangible minerals can be used as a form of trade. Perhaps even a labor economic system can work where there is no need for currency but the use of neighboring labor can become a mainstream or local form of economy. Nonetheless, despite of many diversity in economics systems, they can all come together into an alternate innovative and complex market environment convenient for those who want to utilize it. This form of super economics will provide with various economic and market opportunities which I believe could cater to unlimited ways of becoming prosperous and generating wealth (without or with very little (if necessary) political affiliation or regulation). 

•  I love frappuccinos or white chocolate mochas. Either that Swedish fish or kettle corn. Man I love Swedish fish; especially those 1.9 lbs bags. I have such a sugar tooth right now. :T

• I think it would be really cool to utilize exoskeleton technology and replace current construction equipment like bulldozers and digging rigs. 

• (Controversial) I had the strange science fiction-like idea of what would happen if an unstoppable power could take over and control dimensions/ realities and move from dimension/ realities taking over other dimensions/ realities. How can something like that be stopped? Perhaps once they figure out the solution to resolutionize/ restructure matter or dimensional material how can that be stopped? Just an extremely crazy question using my imagination. 

• Seeing all the police misconduct in the nation today. I have come to the conclusion that it's because these cops aren't given proper training. Their training is more military training than police defense. I think the US should consider Japan's police force as a proper police force model. Another conclusion is that it's most likely done on purpose from those at the top of command. Someone must have given the authorization for this kind of training, let alone the equipment the police force has been given. 

• I think although radio or certain widely used frequency waves are said to not be dangerous, I suspect perhaps having a large quantity could be harmful.

• The world needs Philosophers for its own existence and progression. The world needs philosophers and philosopher groups to come up with scenarios or list of scenarios of what are possibilities for current and future problems. They should also come up with possible solutions. The more outcomes or list of ideas that can be thought up, the more the country can be protected, quick to react, or be not betaken by surprise by unpredictable in scenarios.  

•  I believe we should bring back the role of philosophers. I believe Philosophers should be a physical occupation that is regarded universal and should always be in demand. I think every company should utilize philosophers for decision making, strategy, and to predict outcomes and circumstances for the longevity of their products and services. 

• My comment on Youtube (No more billionaires by Thomhartmann): "I have two different opinions. My first opinion is: I think it's great to have billionaires; however, i think they should perhaps feel a personal obligated to help out their country, give back to the community, and to do good in the world because of the position they are in. Perhaps with wealth, great responsibility. I think this should be the culture of the wealthy. I think we should all be polite, humbling, and ask for opportunity from the wealthy so that the wealthy can be in a position to where they would be free-willing to help the lower class. We should welcome them instead of point fingers. My next opinion can be seen as perhaps a bit liberal. I propose perhaps there should be a cap on the wealthy, such as when they reach one trillion dollars. I also propose this one trillion dollars uses a model that mathematically fluctuates depending on market growth. They still have the ability to make more money; however, perhaps have a cap tax to which it is necessary to invest money back into the system, not for personal gain, but as wealth recycling for the purpose to make other and communities wealthy. Strictly speaking money reinvested into the nation should never be touched by the government. This is my plan that I believe even some billionaires that believe in humanitarianism would be willing to agree on."

• My comment on Has this teen created the world's safest gun? - Luminaries by UPROXX on Youtube: I like the idea of having a fire arm that's safe. However, I liked the first idea to make a padding around the grip that recognizes the user's hand prints, so that an infant cannot discharge the weapon. I don't find the idea of a chip within a weapon very practical unless people are interested in buying a weapon with this mechanism already built inside it. I think such a device, if defected could be even more dangerous than in the hands of an infant. I also believe such a weapon can be dangerous if given government control, because of government's history of desired for control and controversial political agendas. I'm also sure the reason for this video being made has very much to do with politics; however, I believe great technology can be developed for those who desire it.

• I suppose the human world, human practices.

• I think that which has dual meaning should only look at the good meaning.

• I believe there are two kinds of interpretations of beliefs: Perceived belief and objective belief. Perceived belief has values according to one's own thoughts (and perhaps feelings and imagination). Objective belief is the belief as to something tangible (something you can sense [see or touch]).

• I joke around using the term human loosely with people who are close. I use this term to demonstrate a notion that humans have done many things in history and have had a variety of cultures. It's my own buzzword that is not used to feel superior but to show people make mistakes and like to look at things from a human perspective.

• I think it's great to have the idea that, "If I become rich you become rich with me". I think this is something we all should account for instead of having the idea that one can get ahead by taking advantage of others.

• Psychology can be a great tool for motivating a person. For example: Instead of putting someone down for never doing anything. Uplift them by telling them you will help them or make a chart/ deadline for them to do something and perhaps even offer a reward.

• When offering advice, what might work for someone else might not work for you. Therefore, be mindful of other's opinions, but find out what works for you.

• Should it be that politics should start at the local level then grow as to reach other states, instead of influencing a nation as a whole which affect all, even if they are not in favor for it?

• I think there should be places where people that are homeless can get mental help or offer services for basic needs.

• Could it be that the true meaning of the universe and humanity is meaningless, but what lies in the afterlife is what drives meaning? Could it be the progression of our consciousness, if existing on higher realms, possibly gives meaning; perhaps if it is in an endless cycle of life, death, existence in a the higher realms of the afterlife, and perhaps back into a human again, perhaps until we reach an higher status in an higher realm or obtain a higher level of consciousness?

• Perhaps the only meaning we have in the universe is the meaning we give ourselves.

• (maybe) I believe there could be a problem for future generations when they see the works of others and tell themselves the work has already been done therefore there's nothing more they need or can do, and grow comfortable with the idea of not doing anything. I think they should learn it and perhaps be given the task to disprove, challenge, come up with an idea to which they themselves believes is correct. Doing this I believe they could find their own unique path instead of relying on the works of others, yet appreciate the works of others. 

• If I were to look for the answer of human existence or greater purpose, I would either look on a higher level of existence or a lower level of existence. Our existence could offer clues or prove meaningless. Perhaps in looking at the two one could find similarities as if a complete cycle, thus possibly reaching the extent of knowledge of our reality. Nonetheless, there is always the possibility that looking at such levels of existence will only lead to more clues or further deception. I have drawn my conclusion that there either is no end, that it's meaningless, or that the only answer lies outside our existence. In addition, even if we obtain the answer, although we may feel complete or a sense of accomplishment, we could find our-self more worst off than before as to continue to struggle for meaning. 

• Assuming there's a God. In the afterlife could it be that humans are still on a level to which cannot yet interact with God? Could God be a life source or a collectivism rather than an entity? 

• In the afterlife, I wonder if you create your own reality (similar to a dream environment; perhaps you might be the only one there) or if there's an overall higher dimension that is shared among other entities. 

• I find the afterlife a very interesting topic, I want to believe in it completely, but find it wise for me to keep an open mind instead. According to my favorite Youtube psychic Kelli In The Raw, it's best not to enter the light when you die but to hang back and take in the dying experience until being completely able to make a decision. 

• I think one of the greatest fears today which we should be mindful of is a technology which could be used from outer space or in the Earth's atmosphere which has the ability to go anywhere in the globe undetected very quickly, and be able to use it as a super weapon to control or manipulate people/ society. Controversially and imaginatively, perhaps a technology which came from extraterrestrials but used by humans. 

• I think expectations (I consider an influence through the possible negative side of culture) can perhaps influence relationships in a negative way. For example: If a man needs to gain the affection of a female by seemingly taking on a role as what a female expects a guy to be (as seen in many romance movies or music videos), then how is it a man can live to such expectations and win a female's hearts? It's my opinion a man shouldn't change, he should just be himself. 

• It's seems it's easy to discredit any individual. Often the less one knows the more easier to discredit. I propose a question. Can you look at a crazy hippy  theorist who believes in something completely crazy such as having the energy sky people talk to him and credit him on the factual statements he offers and good things he says? I have an example to which i use which I feels gives me insight as well as questions the crazy man, while also furthering our relationship. I propose to simply listen to the man. Don't believe what he says but consider it. appreciate his beliefs, but question them from your own opinions. In the future you will have so much knowledge you can sift through what's factual and what could go together, and what is complete nonsense, you will also understand how the human mind works and why people do what they do and think as they think; I believe this to be the very essence of knowledge from understanding. If all the information is irrelevant, perhaps one can use it to make an interesting book which captures and inspires the minds of many. 

• I agree with the actions of a person who is passive aggressive when they are angry or annoyed. I think it's a rational way of dealing with their emotions yet keep the harmony and not fueling hatred. I also agree the best thing to do when one has caused another to become passive aggressive is to apologize immediately. I don't think it's a good idea to ask them how they feel. Another idea is to put some distance between you and the person who is passive aggressive. I think silence in this situation can be a remedy for healing. 

• I don't think society should be very structured, I think it should be loose and okay to make mistakes. Although unstructured, I think it's also a good idea to create a harmonious and considerate atmosphere with others. 

• I want to believe in the idea that the most humble apology can leave an impression for self reflection. 

• Perhaps the lack of humility or sincerer apology can lessen society's desire to be or maintain rationality. 

• When thinking about teachers: If you have a student committed to ignorance, show them what they could learn. For example:  from the periodic table, give them a brief and interesting history of the periodic table, explain theory in an interesting way, have everyone wear lab coats and come up with theories of what what will happen if you melt metal or freeze something beyond freezing temperatures, show them an experiment. The use of strategy and perhaps structure can be a good way to get them excited and curious. If nothing still appeals to them, maybe have a change of environment and maybe a change of mindset, talk to them as if they were co-workers or members of your team instead of students. I also believe the use of psychology can also be beneficial. Offer them rewards (like playing a song they like), create a culture within the class environment, and maybe change structure to start with the fundamentals (what's necessary to teach) and have them work on what's most easiest to what's harder, and maybe even find a way to have them work in teams of three and help each other (if you can get them in a collective mindset). I think there are answers to dealing with such individuals. I think if one also understand the cultural influence that drive the attention of these students, then maybe one can find a way to capture their attention and keep them focused. 

• I agree with this quote. "A person who holds an irrational belief can be due to the belief giving them strength or something that they need." -Rick Rauser. I also agree that people are naturally or to an extent irrational, but it's up to ourselves to be as reasonable and as rational as possible. 

• How do you communicate with an irrational person or a person with an irrational belief? I think maybe by talking to them on a rational level and by asking them questions that do not offend them but gets them to think more acutely. I also think the more profound the question, the more I believe it could influence the person. Nonetheless, I theorize if a person is completely unchangeable in beliefs or fails to see logic, perhaps demonstrating the use of ethics and etiquettes greater than their own could allow them to see the wrong within themselves (I believe this to be a behavior that perhaps could affects the subconscious. It could also be that it seems those who believe a certain way show traits of having a superiority complex to which want to show others they are morally better than others but can't help but to examine a behavior or demonstration of ethics greater of their own which in a long time perhaps could cause them to be conditioned to change their attitude or even beliefs). 

• According to my research it seems I have stumbled upon the conclusion that evil spirits posses those who are of a weak mind. Specifically, those with strong beliefs that have no strong consciousness of themselves, those who are incoherent with the reality around them, and those in general weak of mind. Perhaps the only way to prevent such a terrifying event is to become mentally strong perhaps by seeking knowledge, never purposely inviting a malevolent spirit, know how to protect oneself by calling for spiritual help, and most importantly to understand oneself. 

• I guess I am a bit of a knowledge vampire. The way I see things is, nobody and nothing is protected from my ability to obtain knowledge. I guess there is such a thing as a knowledge addiction. 

• Possibly stated a while back, even nonfactual information are sources of information and knowledge. One doesn't have to believe the information nor should believe it completely, it's with good intention to acknowledge the open possibilities that one can use and source of information as a reference. 

• I don't completely believe in psychics, but I find their skill set very interesting, useful, insightful, and resourceful.  I can only wish I had the ability to have such useful skills (or perhaps to the proficiency of those with higher level skills than I have). 

• I find comfort in the idea to have the desire to separate myself from that which currently exists as a norm or common. I want to carve my own path, create my own culture, be completely original. I find the idea of becoming a hero somehow overly delightful. I could only wish I could be given such an opportunity. 

• Doing what's right sometimes might not be as much of a good idea compared to doing what works. 

• I think if a system convicts you but has done greater evils. Cast aside personal faults and seek justice to that which has committed greater evil. 

• What disables a person from listening? Is it ignorance, annoyance, or fear? Could it be social-influenced conditioning or culture? If a man who was a conspirator were to address topics and have what he claims is undeniable proof, what should a person do? Should they insult or drive the persona way, or should they accept and consider the idea? I would imagine such a topic could spark fear or denial in a person. Should the conspirator address the topic in a manner to which they shouldn't be captivated by fear. Perhaps an even better tactic would be to let the person do the research on their own. Regardless of the example, I think everyone should be free to comprehend a topic of high sensitivity and accept the information as insight or resource, even if they don't believe it, because I believe all information is a matter of resources and intelligence.  

• Overall, it's up to a person to utilize ethics and etiquette. I simply want to address the value and importance of ethics and etiquette and perhaps offer insight or even a guide to which will bring people to become more harmonious, cooperative, respectful, and collective towards each other. I think this is the tool for human progress and to be used an example for western society. 

• I personally don't see western society as very introvert friendly. I think the use of ethics can help accommodate for this personality model. 

• A good way to pre-visualize mistakes, problems, or find out what could go wrong is to try and write down every idea/ situation of what could go wrong. From then, one can take steps to prevent the idea/ situation from going wrong. This is part of strategy. 

• I watched Mr. Huff's video (Horrific. Another Demon Attack...) and I realized, potentially talking with the spirits is a bad thing and can be dangerous if the spirits continuously tell you warnings. 

• My post on Actualize.org's video (Spiritual Enlightenment - The Most SHOCKING Truth You'll Ever Hear) on Youtube: I also suppose those who also have realized this truth might feel accepting to the truth, however, it still seems they strive for personal purpose, because even though one can know of this supposed truth, there is nothing they think they can do about it or use it like their own secret super power, to their own advantage.  I also see that those who also realize this truth continue to question this truth wondering what does it all mean or if there is something they didn't think about. Perhaps one can continuously find themselves in a cycle to which they are still looking for the answer even though they think they might already have reached the answer maybe in hopes  to find anything they missed out or could discover. I think about this and find myself approaching the same answer from multiple angles and can't help but to continue the cycle to continue to think about it. Moreover, as explained later in your video, even if one doesn't subscribe to the social norms, mindset, cultures, and ideology, they find themselves seemingly alone, because of their originality which potentially could set them apart from others (perhaps physically with one's own taste in fashion, or mentally thinking so far out-the-box nobody understands or cares) seemingly making them different from others or unable to communicate on a level of how deep they can think that perhaps is unobtainable by others. 

• Balance catering to others and to oneself. Try to help others, but also balance between your own agenda. As Leo stated from Actualized.org, people have their own values. You need to cater towards your own values and what you want for your own life's legacy. 

• I enjoy this quote by Leo. "I am completely independent of the good and bad opinions of others."I think such a quote reflect on self values and the ability to go one's own direction in life without rely or catering to the opinions of others.

• My blog is my art. Although nobody cares about it, I somehow consider it my life's work and masterpiece. 

• Perhaps in an era of troubling times, the life of one will always be subjected to risk when speaking their opinions or truths openly. 

• An irrelevant idea: could it be spirits should be fought spiritually, and physical should be fought physically? 

• Controversial: Regarding conspiracy, perhaps all free masons should do their research (especially on the Lucifarian bible/texts to which higher freemasonry is supposedly later higher subscribed too) and get out while they can but after submitting their salvation, conversion and protection to a religious higher being, specifically Jesus Christ.

• Controversial: Referring to the spirit world and demons or evil entities, it seems humanity is protected when they call for Jesus or Saint Michel. Although, perhaps a great form of defense, I wonder if the average person has the ability to protect themselves from malicious entities. Could there be a way to form some sort of defense or maybe even a spiritual guard? Could people fight back with their own spiritual power? 

• Perhaps there should be regulation due to the exploitation of psychology. For example false advertisement in Africa where countries that produce diamonds and hold gold reserves are told they rely  on foreign support. 

• I propose a new holiday, I would call this day, Fundamental day, where people disconnect from all electronics and reflect on person traditions, family, and enjoying a day where there is absolutely nothing to do but to appreciate what one has and how they contribute themselves to the lives of others. 

• Why is it someone always wants to play God. Is it delusion created from power and wealth? Is it the goal of ideology, spirituality, or cultism? It's my own opinion those who want to be God are most likely ethically inferior than the poorest ideological person on Earth; for God is an entity of perfection and perhaps on a status almost unattainable, because of our lack of understanding what it means to be God. Therefore, if man wants to be God, it is only an imitation of God portrayed by their greatest ethical weaknesses.

• I have a feeling perhaps my blog will be read or noticed after I'm dead; if not completely forgotten. I'm under the impression, although I feel it should have relevance in helping humanity create an ethical, prosperous, or harmonious society, it's only out of my seemingly uncontrollable supposed delusion. In such a case, I can only hope no one will think wrongly or badly of me. These notes would have remained in journals, text documents, and diaries; most likely never to be found, but instead I made the decision to blog my ideas and opinions instead. I have faced plenty of scrutiny and embarrassment from writing my opinions and ideas freely. Despite the negativity, I continue to write because it's a hobby I find purpose in. Since I've faced such scrutiny, I have pulled away from publicizing what I write. I feel my world is so constricting, as if ready to eat me alive if I speak my opinions, therefore I write about it instead; regardless as controversial and explicit it may be. I don't ever expect anyone to take interest in what I write. I write because I can. It's my way of escape as well as what I would like to think is my message in a bottle for all of humanity.

• I think perhaps when population trust in government is low, maybe it's a good idea that all requested documents should be made public instantly. I believe this will be the key to unlock a broken system so that it can be fixed. 

• I believe the Freemasons perhaps at one time stood for something and had good and prosperous intentions. However, I think they were eventually hijacked by another organization with evil intentions and agendas. 

• After doing some research I realized how much the government system in the United States is a work of genius; however, it currently isn't functioning as if was intended to, there is beyond too many corruptions involved. Without a doubt, Master Kung (Confucius) would have walked away as it was a sovereignty doomed to fail. I believe it can only be helped by those who are willing to help it by doing what is right and common sense.

• (futurist capitalism) I had the idea to turn capitalism into a futuristic or more than sustainable idea. I think it would be great to have money but to live as if without money. With innovation in technology, the cost of manufacturing is cheap, products are enough to be affordable yet balanced enough to where producers can make a lot of money and sustain or even overproduce production of goods. Those who have no money can easily obtain money with minimal effort. It's the idea where markets are always completing for greater products at the most decent price. The market is constantly in innovating leaving room for expansion and new roles for people. I do believe a system needs to be put in place to keep up with production and individual lives; for example: as people grow in numbers, the system should balance between the number of places to live and how much food can be produced. If in the population is exceeding in a rapid rate, there should be yield/ warning indicators by calculation for a governing body to set temporarily in effect for the limitation of children, perhaps even have a temporary implemented tax on newly born children. Nonetheless, all taxes should be completely stripped from the American people. The government is to have a system that calculates the size of the government compared to the size needed for the people, which should be kept at a very micro size unless completely necessary (for example, possible interstellar expansion). Everything the government does is to be completely public and transparent, unless necessary (for example, times of war). Anything micro issue the government faces is to be made public immediately by unbiased sources. Whistle blowers are to be upheld and be given full protection. The laws should be made know so that even a child in middle school understands it. Systems should be put in place where average people can have greater involvement in government and laws. It's where the education is kept local and in constant competition for greater intellectual status; in addition, educational institutions are to also teach ethics, entrepreneurship, daily life values, to with each individual should be self-driven to burn with a desire to learn more on their own. Controversially, I also believe they should also be taught the safety of using a weapon. It's an education system of students having a huge desiring to learn and curiosity. Institutions should also very in structure for example, single-track systems, multi-track systems, and even independent systems. Local governments should hold greater powers than the national government. I also believe micro governments, which are the cities and communities should comply by local government laws but have the freedom to choose their own cultures and limited law. I also believe local governments should also carry their own currency in addition to national currency which is backed by something tangible and of value. Moreover, local governments can also communicate with the national government to persuade or incentivize people to provide in services that are in demand. When most countries are prosperous and at peace, then a world government with extremely little power should be established, the purpose of this system is simply to inform. It's is up to a nation's local governments (perhaps in cooperation with micro governments; if exists) to act on global occurrences and make the decision to provide assistance. Moving on, there should always be a military due to possible threats from different worlds. On the subject of weapons, I believe every person should have the right to own a weapon only if: they are completely conscious of its lethality, uphold respect to the tool, and operate the weapon with ethics, safety to others, and fully acknowledge the operation and professionalism of using a weapon. In conclusion, this is perhaps my idea of what prosperity should look like through my own vision. If any new ideas come up, I’ll add it to the list.
  
  
• I dream of the day I can create a game company in the USA or Brasil that uses a Japanese-style structure blended with an American more laid back structure. 

• Be yourself and developer your own personalized culture. Show a little bit of your culture wherever you go.

• Perhaps if one desires wisdom, one must search for it. Within themselves and in external knowledge.

• The Lord and the Soldier: The soldier entered the bullet riddled chapel. The soldier searched the places, looking for evidence of the enemy. Suddenly there was a wind, followed by a bright light. "Have no fear for I am with you." A man says in a gentle voice wearing white robes. The soldier couldn't help but to stand there in a complete perplexed state of mind. He immediately lowered his weapon, he knew who the man was. The man surrounded by light gently lowered his hands. The soldier looked up. "Lord, I have a question." He asked. The man looked down at him and nodded. "Is it right to kill?" The soldier asked. "Those who kill will see the judgment of God." The man replied. "Why do many evil powerful men kill, enslave, and torture and continue to live without remorse of their actions?" The soldier asked again. The man looked up to the heavens."Forgive those who do wrong to you for their actions will see the judgment of God." The man replied once more." The soldier looked down. "I have one more question. Then is it right for me to kill?" The soldier asked. The man said nothing. The soldier lifted his rifle to his chest. "If it is the price of one soul but saves the lives of many while fighting for freedom and peace, then I think the cost is justifiable. Therefore, let God be my judge." The soldier stated before saying nothing else, turning around, and leaving the chapel. 

• A good practice I've developed that I believe could be useful for only people is the use of talking to myself to remember things. For example, whenever I forget something, I ask my brain to help me remember it for me. Most of the times I've done this, surprisingly I remember what I need. Another good practice is giving all subjects a random back story, alternate name, or even an abbreviation. 

• I think it's important to value the mistakes we make. I think one cannot learn without also making mistakes. I would like to believe mistakes are like stepping stones, the more steps we take the higher we get. After all, I believe nobody's perfect, those who seem perfect surely must have a record of mistakes. 

• I believe people should have the ability to like anything they wish, even if it's perverted, controversial, childish, or disturbing. They should "own it". Nonetheless, it's good to be mindful of what people think. If what one likes is controversial or knowingly not in the others favor or understanding, keep it a secret. Let there be some mystery about you. Although, I feel like I've addressed a lot of my interests in this blog, I never tell anyone about it unless I truly trust them. 

• I think people perhaps should pay attention what they say. I think it's in good manner to say things we mean and do our best to not say things we don't mean, especially when we're angry. If the subject is conflicting or can be seen as too harsh, then the use of extreme politeness can be a good tool to use. In addition, if one says something mean, we shouldn't become irrational or take it personally. I believe it's in good favor to try and correct them. If it cannot be helped, then there is no further purpose for a conversation. More importantly, I also believe it's right to apologize for anything one says if the might have lead the other person to become irrational. Apologizing and removing oneself from a confrontation I believe will be the tool to get the irrational individual to see what is wrong within themselves. 

• Often for me the line of politeness and being taken advantage of can be hard to distinguish. Nonetheless, I think by asking oneself what one desires and what the other possibly desires and the means of achieve that desire will make the situation more distinguishable. 

• I recently discovered an article to what I found a lot of enjoyment in. The idea that people go through so much effort in finding a someone to be their life partner when maybe they should be looking for a person who will be their best friend. The article can be found here:  http://thoughtcatalog.com/marisa-donnelly/2016/04/i-dont-want-a-lover-i-want-a-best-friend/

• I think it would be interesting to create an internet save state library where people can visit or maybe even download whenever they want to stay at a specific year on the internet. For example: My most memorable time in my childhood were in the days of dial-up. I would love to have an internet save reference to visit the websites that existed in that year of the unrestricted internet. 

• Just as in the story of Confucius, when people aren't economically prosperous, their attitudes will become negative, crime will rise, and mortality will rise. 

• I believe ethics and rationality is the closest one can be to God or godliness. 

• When a child acts completely uncontrollable or disobedient, it's my opinion to be the result of the characteristics or systemic behavior of the parents. 

• Never judge upon the miracles a person can perform but the message of their actions. 

• Conspiracy: I believe all global elite and those associated which have stole from the US and other countries should give back twice the amount of the money owed, primarily in gold, a long with property and other economic values if they cannot afford to pay back. In addition, all counties that get involved in the internal civil conflict of the US will grant the right for the US to take possession of it's properties and real estate. It's my belief to let justice be paid in twice the amount for evils beyond the comprehension of humanity. 

• Reflecting back on my high school years and knowing what I know now, I believe I would have learned more if I didn't have homework. 

• I'm a strong believer that the government should operate under operating hours unless there is an extreme emergency. 

• Could it be the closer one gets to truth the more things seem random?

• (Government) Maybe a good idea could be that perhaps there should be a government transparency system. This system can be that if satisfaction of government by the people falls under a certain low percent (20% for example), then a level system of transparency for government begins to diminish, thus allowing for potentially more transparency for the people, of course depending on classification of documents. The more the dissatisfaction level drops, the more exposure the governments is mandatory to provide to the people. When satisfaction reaches extreme lows, then classified documents will then have to be provided. 

• (curreny/social) I think instead of paying with money people should also cut deals or something i would like to call small-temp contract. 

• When people stop seeing other people as people and more as objects, variables, or property, that's my opinion the turn over for evil. We need to respect all that are human and intelligent, even if they are misguided individual. 

• I had a profound thought/vision/strong feeling that one day I would be in a position of running an empire. It' will never happen of course (unless in video games), but it's just something strange I have. My ansestrial tree came from great nobility so maybe that's where the feeling comes from; that maybe there would still be a way to find what's left of my royal family and pick up from after them. I hope no one labels me for something I'm not by sharing this narrative. I just thought it would be an interesting thing to share. 

• I believe by exploring one's feelings, thoughts, and sorting through the accumulation of information collected over time, one can make a judgment of what they feel is happening or what they feel is right. I find it's okay to be wrong. Being wrong is an opening to be corrected and to learn and progress to perfection. I also find if one does not know a subject, ask questions or ask to explain. To question is to learn. 

• I believe it's okay to admit if one's thoughts are clouded or if one cannot come up with any thoughts or answers. This is honesty. I believe being accurate is also describing how one is feeling to a response. 

• To my personal understanding there is two kinds of scientific minds. Factual and abstract. Abstract analyzes and utilizes all resources of information (including hypothesis and conspiracy). Factual minds utilize reports and information which is factual, proven, and seemingly completely objective. 

• (Highly controversial) I would like to start a new cultural norm of accepting a controversial subject. The subject of nudity and how I think one should properly react to nudity. I think nudity should be turned into a form of humility and acceptance. I think one shouldn't put too much emphasis in nudity and should have tolerance whenever the see nudity. I think they should appreciate whenever they see the bare body of another. I think if nudity doesn't express it's current cultural norm for arousal, I think genders can have a tolerance towards nudity.