In a current time period of technological advancements, global trade, big business, strategy, and academic success, you'd think the idea of wars would be unnecessary and barbaric left for a barbaric age. Most of the world believes war is necessary, but I find it highly the contrary. I believe war is absolutely unnecessary. I think wars can be the result of decisions being made and things being done that the typical public cannot see. I call it the agendas, situations, and events behind a hidden world most people have no access to. For example, perhaps it can be the influence of global banks, decisions by global elites, influence of corporations, the desire by contracts and business war deals, powerful global agendas, and competing power structures. Since these are realities distant to access by most people, the world will never fully understand what goes on behind the scenes that influences the push towards wars. This being said, I believe in an age such as our own, wars can be handled diplomatically and rationally with logic with modern, diplomatic, and peaceful solutions. I understand the needs of military force to combat external extreme forces who do not believe in the means of diplomacy, this makes sense, but for small or unnecessary disputes such as territory and resources, I believe there can be diplomatic and peaceful solutions. Some might say it this is already done through the UN, however, observing the immature behaviors of UN officials, I do not believe this is possible. All parties must have a need and desire for peaceful and rational diplomatic solutions. My original idea was to have a global court, but for this, there must be global-law or some sort of treaty creating structure. I now think a global court is not entire needed because things can simply be handled through good leaderships who place peace and solutions above greed and aggressive or emotional strategies. For example, countries fighting over resources can come to a table and discuss resource management. They can discuss time frames, percentages, and tradeoffs for win-win scenarios instead of invading landmasses which risk lives. For example, they can share territories or come up with time-frames in which to share territories. Solutions can be like discussing business with the use of negotiations, deals, agreements, and trade-offs. All that is required is a strong and negotiative leader with a business mindset and a desire to maintain peaceful solutions. Leaders can come together and discuss solutions and agreements which can help each other. There is no need for any wars or risking the lives of people. The throwing away of lives is outdated and barbaric and can be handled by more intelligent and rational means. I think the only time when war is necessary or inevitable is when there is no leader who wants to negotiate and immediately resorts to physical aggressive and vi0lent extreme tactics. This makes sense to have a defending or counteracting military force to prevent absolute chaos, d3struction, and unnecessary lived taken. Overall, we live in an age of great logic, reason, philosophy, ethics, and strategies. Our technologies are advanced but our abilities to strategize and form solutions is weak. We should approach conflicts with a high degree of intelligence and reasoning. The solution is intelligent and great negotiating and business-thinking leaders who have the ability to negotiate positive and win-win solutions. Leaders who are influential and can make deals that not only are solutions but are deals other countries and groups cannot refuse. This is my idea of how wars can become an event of the past and a new age of deal-making and influential leaders can maintain and build a world to be more peaceful and prosperous. This is a step towards humanity building a better world which allows all nations to grow, build, and eventually explore the starts and beyond and build a human-interstellar-cosmic community or neighborhood.
No comments:
Post a Comment