Basic Standard of Wealth Ceiling

My brother came to me with an idea for a system. His system was for robots to replace the lower class workers and for the average individual to be supplied by the government a basic standard of living. I believed he called it the basic equality. Although his general overview of his idea was simple, I questioned about the loop holes of his ideas. I believe he has still yet to come to a solid conclusion of how it would work. I proposed a similar idea of which I will explain. This idea is not new and has supposedly been around since the 1930s. I read a book a while back in which a famous economist explained a system in which automated manufacturing would be the solution for the future. I don’t remember the book because it’s been so long ago, but it also gave questioned a similar system to what my brother had in mind. His general thesis was that manufacturing could be used to create a quality of living in which people were able to obtain a basic standard of lifestyle with the ability to climb up the latter of success. My brothers idea was to use government to create a basic lifestyle foundation in which people had a house, a car, and given money to raise in society as they obtained a desire for a career or pursuit of passion. Robots would be used to replace workers and provide everyone with the ability to strive for future endeavors. Although it sounds good, there are many drawbacks from a current era western-minded civilization. People who do not want to work pose a thread of comfort in such a system which could render the idea potentially stifling. I came up with my own suggestions building on his idea and the idea proposed in the book I once read and put together a more functional and more psychological take on such a system. This system goes as this: There are two fundamental ideologies, one of freedom of the people and one of control. This idea is for freedom of the people. It is not Marxist, despite having a partial similar element to a socialistic foundation. The system goes like this. I proposed a system in which the local government provided their state with a basic standard of living, a safety-net for all people and families. An idea that could replace welfare entirely for something more productive and functional. Students can live on their own, families could live together despite financial hardships, the retired could live on their own without the need for worry in financial instability. I call this system the “Basic Standard of Wealth" ceiling. The quality of life is much of a low standard as one could obtain a reasonable size apartment room, a vehicle which is fairly inexpensive, a very bare-bone basic income for food and clothes. Instead of replacing jobs with robots(like my brother's idea), have these jobs open for the “starting or restarting class”. Robots can be applied to larger scale mass manufacturing so that people can obtain products more cheaply (purchase vehicles, electronic devices). The greatest part of such system is that education is completely free for students of all ages. Students can return to school whenever the want. Institutional faculty, teachers, and boards will be paid well by the local governments. Local government will allow for competition among the Basic Standard of Wealth (BSW). This might allow people to migrate to other states that provide greater benefits for the system. States will compete in this basic standard of wealth system because it will help cultivate their cities bringing more wealth and value with the need to fill in jobs, career opportunities, and create heavy business competition. The overall point of this system is to give people the stable foundation in which they can peruse their educational desire for trade or passion. There is a problem, however. There will be those who will find comfort in doing nothing with their life. This can be done through a lack of motivation and inspiration, negative environmental culture, or those who feel isolated due to the potential pace or perception of usefulness to this system. To get people to not become ignorantly supported by this Basic Standard of Wealth, they have to get approved every month by presenting a plan to an office that provides with these services. Those who apply to collect small payment from this system will have to convince officers that they have a goal and are taking steps to achieve that goal and are providing the evidence of that effort. If they are not approved, they must find approval elsewhere (perhaps according to county jurisdiction).  With the fear of not being approved, people will not do crime and will desire to be on board with the requirements for this system. I want to think this is using psychology against those who are ignorant or wish to maintain a long duration constant comfort of living for the sake of unethical or selfish desires; hopefully changing their ideologies of hording handouts. Another issue with instant implementation is the challenge of rediscovering the quality of ethics, because of the culture created by poverty, this will have to be changed with the oncoming generations with education. The system doesn’t come without it challenges. This problem for this system could reside in the transition to this system from our current system in which I will explain later. The use of developmental education will be the biggest importance to this system. Schools will compete in education and in talent. Much like the strict quality of Asian schools, children at an early age will be taught ethics as ethics will play an extremely vital role in the quality of society. Due to the psychological results of education in Asia, there will be lenience as it’s critical for students to have a sense of moderate independence and vital importance of not only gaining intelligence and understanding, but to grow in hyper intellectual capabilities. There is still yet to experiment with education such as the influence in psychology for potentially more productive learning ideas such as the use of addictiveness found in games or the use of personalized curiosity, and a handful of alternate methods (such as catering to student adaptive learning capabilities)  to teach students. In this system, when individuals obtain a job or career, they can improve on the quality of lifestyle they desire. They can purchase a new car, a bigger home, assets of luxury, and so much more. If they fail or lose their job, the Basic Standard of Wealth ceiling will be a reliable source to fall back on. It still is sink or swim, it’s just that there is a foundation in which people will be not be afraid to fail. The implementation of this system seemingly simple without perhaps factoring the human elements. Much like the use of promissory notes without value, this system can be done through the use of debt and growth. The switch could happen overnight (as an example there is a reason this shouldn’t happen yet). It can be done by instantly leveraging the quality of all occupations to the idea of importance or how much value a job provides to the state. A teacher and farmer will further be regarded as high paying occupations. Manufacturing will need to be revolutionized for mass manufacturing of good. Essentially with technology and mass manufacturing we can create a super economy by artificially paying companies and businesses temporarily and having the state pay them back later, much like a loan but in reverse.  Another way to put it is the state is the small business and it takes on a loan to the companies in which the state pays the companies back as mass productivity rises. I believe this to be the temporary start to building this super economy. The reason I stated this idea should not be implemented immediately is because this idea needs to be tested. Much like the Mouse Utopia experiment by John Calhoun where mice were used to test out utopic ideas in limited space, with the use of psychology and sociology, it’s my hypothesis that if the rats in the Utopia experiment had an incentive to climb to a greater quality of life, they would do so as the negative stimuli would provide a level of guilt in which they have to endure a level of constant discomfort to continue doing the wrong to which I believe subconsciously acts against human nature to achieve. You do good, it is rewarded with a greater quality lifestyle, do wrong and it’s difficult to get what you want. The best thing about this system is my belief that it uses psychology to naturally persuade people to desire a raise in a better quality of lifestyle because of how easy it is. With the use of this idea, I also believe the financial institutions can not only return to the gold standard but they can also switch to a precious metal and jewel standard. Taking it a step further than that, they can also test Jacque Fresco’s resource based economic system. Overall, this is my idea of a more functional system to go along side with our current system of government. A system in which prizes individual freedom and success, eliminates crime, creates a basic standard of wealth in which individuals don’t have the fear of losing everything when they fail, the economy can switch to a super-fast pace hyper economy due to intense competition, where people are highly educated and have a high degree of ethics, and which to my belief is the formula to become a space-exploring civilization. I want to believe this is the next evolution in creating a greater America. Its main idea of this support structure is much like the 1930s book I described and my brothers idea, however this provides my take on the full mechanics of this system.
 

Artwork from NeoTokyo

(this article is subject to minor changes and improvements)

03/16/2019 

I believe quality of education is the key to the incentive of this safety net system idea. I believe a system of education that is based on psychology of the students; utilizing the best methods, strategies, and structures of learning and teaching; looking at the most functional system of education around the world and adopting compatible methods, strategies, and structures; utilizing and training the best teachers that will inspire and motivate students by making subjects interesting, providing experiments, and developing a sense of exploration and personal experimentation will be the greatest tool for the success of this system and the overall nation. 

I believe a requirement to stay within the safety net system is to show personal initiative of providing academic related test results; producing products; producing useful research or journalism; delivering or show incremental progress of quality art; and providing acceptable services. Essentially they need to portray a social or personal value (something that can contribute to culture, themselves, or society) and personal perseverance towards progress. 

If they purposefully do nothing, produce nothing, or care for nothing, they will be abandoned by the system until they choose to participate in the system. If they are thinking of living off this system without producing or showing something of value then it is a personal choice they have made. This simplicity of this system is that even the person that is most incapable, can produce something of value.

Perhaps another incentive could be the quantity, quality, or excitement of what an individual is producing could present a bonus addition of money (perhaps adding $100) to the safety net system. 

Payments are done bi-monthly. 

Perhaps if they produce less than expected or forecasted, if they don’t deliver, or if they show signs of falling behind dramatically, they can be docked money (perhaps losing $200). 

The system should be a system based on a desire for progress. One’s ignorance is what will get people living on the street. It’s a system that is difficult to lose and easy to gain; a system in which one has to desire to fail in order to fall from the system.  It's also a system in which is easy to get on and help redevelop oneself.

 

My Hypothesis on Ancient Prehistoric Civilizations

Ica Stones of Peru

The Acambaro Figures

Prehistoric man ancient artifacts

I have taken a few weeks to research past civilizations and concluded that during the time of Pangaea, Africa and South America were connected in the Cretaceous era in the prehistoric period. The Cretaceous period is the time period where the great cataclysm occurred where a single even changed life around the globe. It was the cataclysm that caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. Supposedly the asteroid that caused the extinction landed at an angle and not directly which threw a colossal ploom of debris and gases at an angle; sending a colossal storm of fire mixing with the nitrogen and oxygen in the atmosphere. Its belief that in the prehistoric time, people believed there were no humans on Earth, by researching the Ica stones and step pyramids found throughout the world, it is speculated that there were humans and because of Pangaea was connected by the continents, the world was connected. This pre-human world was intelligent but did not have the government philosophies we have today. It was ruled by emperors, tribal leaders, and kings that constantly traded and went to war with each other (ex: Nasca, Atlantians, pre- early-Egyptians, pre-Indian…ect ). This also explains the existence of Neolithic Stonehenge, early Chinese around the Yellow Sea, and native tribes found throughout the world. I believe how these tribes survived was because of the blast direction of the asteroid. I speculate the direction in which the asteroid blasted the earth would have spread a radius of intense heat either in a radial linear path or having an effect that circled the globe. It might also perhaps be found in the reason the ocean being salty and teaming with mass life later during the Cenozoic period. In Egypt, it was theorized that the Egyptians built on top of a more older civilization. The use of the step pyramid can be found throughout the world and has been speculated to had followed the constellation (Orion's Belt) because of the deities that might have come from the stars or used to perhaps yet unlikely chart directions for reaching different places of significance around the globe (perhaps due to its magnetic properties). It is uncertain where their deities (small gods) came from. I won’t get into ancient aliens for it could also be used as a means religious-population control. Examining further, in Egypt they discovered a layer of burned marks in the upper layers of the earth, this might have been the result of intense heat of the asteroid hitting the earth. The Egyptians were also said to be part of the Atlantian race or tribe (the tribe of the Scorpion King of upper Egypt; one of the ten kingdoms supposedly around the time of Atlantis) which was swallowed by the great flood. It was speculated that Atlantis is the Richat structure in the Eye of Africa as it meets Plato’s described criteria. Where did the flood come from? Was it the flood of Noah, Gilgamesh, early Egyptians, and Peru? I have two ideas of the great flood. I speculate the flood could have come from the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs during the cretaceous period, because looking where the asteroid was said to have landed at Chicxulub, Mexico. It was very close to Africa at the time. Looking at the scaring of its geographical location in Richat Africa, it seems evident that Atlantis could have been swallowed by a massive wave 100 to 200 feet tall. This might also explain that the asteroid's heat radius had been so intense that in Peru, the stones of Cusco could have been melted giving the stone a smooth concave beveled look. It could also could explain the instability of the geographical environment during the time of Moses and the reason many tribes and civilization migrated to different regions, especially from lower regions of Africa (of which the skull of Lucy and the child skull Salom was found in Afar, Africa). The layers of the Grand Canyon has been to discovered that the Earth had been flooded eight times with a series of geological changes where ocean beds rose and became mountains. The asteroid could have shaped or contributed to the shaping of Pangaea into the geographical world we see today. Even Atlantis could have risen many feet to become part of the geological location in which it sits today. Looking back at South America being part of Africa during the time of Pangaea, there were stones discovered that housed a primitively colored and carved map which said to had a path from eastern south America to Africa. There were also evidence of lintel and post construction which was the architecturally reused from various cities in Peru to ancient Egypt to ancient Persia. In conclusion, by putting all these potential evidence together I hypothesize humans could have been here during the prehistoric period when the earth was very different geographically.

Moreover, although the ancients were very intelligent, I find it fascinating how it seems the philosophy of democracy was first invented in our era of human history.

Although this portion of the article has nothing to do with my hypothesis, I also want to state my research on Ankor Wat, Doggerland, under the North Sea, Dwarka off the coast of gulf of Cambay; Atlantis located at Richat Sahara's Adrar Plateau (near Ouadane, west–central Mauritani; also known as the Eye of Africa), and Puma Punko, Bolivia was some of the most fascinating research I had doe in my life. I encourage everyone to research and try to piece their own hypothesis of what they think could have happened in the ancient past.

Here is a list of videos of ancient technology also supposedly used by the ancients in which people believed to still be a mystery:

1.Egyptians used the batteries to vibrate stones to cut stones in perfect angles using water.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsqOLCXYznE&t=175s

2. The man who created and moved coral castle used Egyptian technology by reversing the polarity or magnetism of the stones so that he could lift heavy stones easily.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JjjxWIoTmxs

Above is an image of pre-cuneiform writing (top right). The bottom could have been the writing alphabet used by the Atlantians.

My Idea for Prison Reform

America has the highest amount of incarcerated individuals with currently millions in prison. It was around an astounding 2.3 million people in 2016. Despite the use of the system, it seems to me the prison system is more of a method to spread prison culture and refined crime than it is to create individuals that are reformed and reintroduced back into society. I believe in justice and that those who do wrong should pay a fair price. However, I’m not convinced that the American prison system is the best method or perhaps a good enough system compared to what is done around the world. Despite other countries possibly having a better prison system, I have my own ideas for a prison system. I’m sure this isn’t the only time this idea has been established; nevertheless, my idea for a prison system is to create something called the Prison Guard. Minor offenses who don’t meet the level to be in the prison guard are kept in prisons to serve and wait their sentence; however, those who commit great acts of violence, murder, rape (even in prison), and heavy crimes are sent to the Prison Guard. The Prison Guard is a military branch for prisoners. It acts as a border school for the incarcerated aimed to breaking them down, reforming them, building them back up, reintroducing them back into society, and ultimately making them more valuable members of society. We even want them to consider themselves as civil servants of society aimed to creating a better world for themselves and others. The process of turning a hardened criminal into a civil servant isn’t easy for sure, but utilizing psychology studies, there are various methods in which to accomplish just that. The process of breaking them down is essential and is just like basic training in the military. Perhaps it is even more strict and more intimidating to break them from their perceived psychological habits and mindsets. If prisoners are persistent to maintain their habits and to lower the quality and integrity of such system, then there are punishments in which are also tactics and methods used for oppositions by the military, such as: isolation, sense deprivation, insomnia, wake boarding, and other nonlethal methods. It’s a unfortunate process; however, it’s essential to bear in mind that the system aims to build better civil citizens and that they will be eventually reintroduced into society, and which should also not be a repeated offender. As prisoners go through the reform process through the use of military practices, they will have the ability to climb the Prison Guard ranks. By rising through the ranks they will incrementally gain the ability to house larger living spaces, amenities, college courses, sports, music, art, and entertainments. I would highly recommend psychology, philosophy, sociology, ethicology, theology to be part of the curriculum. They will have to convince their officers that they are worthy of going back into society. I would add that their sentence is not complete until they reach a high enough rank and level of satisfaction. We want reformers to be loyal to this program/system that even with a chance to escape, they will remain through personal integrity to stay and serve their sentence. I want to think with such loyalty, we can even give them guard positions to police themselves and eventually earn a salary.

After they are nearing completion of their sentence (perhaps a year or two), they will be prepared and reintroduced slowly into society. After they are finished with their sentence, there is a ceremony and the reformees will thank and apologize to the judges for their crimes and vow to never come back to prison again. If they do, they will know of the even more savvier consequences (much more strict, much more difficult, and harder punishments). They will also have to start all over again from the lowest rank and it will be harder this time to climb the ranks. After they are released, the US military also has the ability to check on their progression and give them opportunities to join the US military.  There will also be job opportunities, some of which can be more dangerous to average citizens, and the ability to build a resume. There will also be opportunities to work in the prison system as well. With an inmate's release they are always given a safeway house for six months in which they can try and make a decent transition back into society.They will also be given a small amount to purchase groceries and necessities.

In conclusion, this is my idea for the prison system. 

Creating Purely Original Concepts from Scratch

A long time ago I head a quote from a unique visionary named Jacque Fresco who is the creator of the Venus Project. He said, “Creativity is taking known elements and putting them together in unique ways”. This quote resonated with me for a long time. It made me think that if everything we create in our minds is made up of already known elements we had previously experienced, how could we as artists or designers create ideas and visions outside the realm of known elements? How can we think so far outside the box that we can come up with new concepts from scratch? I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about this and finally came up with ideas to get a fundamental understanding for creating experimental ideas and visions that are purely original. The fundamental understanding for conceptualizing new ideas is to examine form. Form is shapes, outlines, and variations of tone, texture, and visual elements in which may or may not be given perceptual understanding in our own minds. Imagine looking at a photo and not understanding what an object is in the background. This is a good way to allow the imagination to create narratives and ideas for what a form can be defined. I’ll talk more about forms later on. The next step after interpreting a form is to assign a function to it. The functionality of it can be from an element we understand in our world or it can be undefined or unique. For it to be undefined or unique, it may even be a good idea to remove it from any initial logic and creating a sense of abstraction. Imagine a bathtub is no longer a bathtub but is a floating fortress; imagine a ball is a death star; or imagine a staff as a gun. The variety of seemingly abstract mixes and combinations can be used to create a unique or undefined piece. Now imagine going deeper in a realm where nothing makes sense: A crescent shape with a hook is a planet; a flat plain is a vehicle, a clock is a mountain. Going further into abstraction, illogical combinations, and forms that are not familiar or unmolded into perceptive can be the fundamental start to further conceptualization and iteration. Here is a story to further familiarize with this idea of the use of forms. Imagine you suddenly existed into the world without any mother, familiarity, or understanding of existence, life, or nature. You were the only person on the planet. Your ideology may soon be shaped to where you see something in the distance and as you get closer to it, you think it gets bigger in size. You have no understanding of distance and perspective. You weren’t taught it. You can use this as a way to create, redefine, or refine forms as if seeing it for the first time. Perhaps another way to examine forms is by looking at clouds, strange silhouette, shadows, or even objects that have strange shapes. Your mind can mold them into objects, creatures, landscapes, and scenery. With the use of Jacque’s quote, you’re feeding new and seemingly undefined forms and information into your mind to which you can use, iterate, and ultimately build upon. Another way to increase the use of forms or subject perspective and even story is the use of dreams. Dreams can be a good tool for new ideas as the brain hold a library of past experiences and information. Although when sleeping, the brain is clearing out useless information, using blood to cleanse itself, and relaxing the muscles, the use of dreams, do to these activities, can create even more abstract experiences, narratives, and feelings. If we can remember what we dream, we can use it for art, story, and design. The best method of retaining memories from dreams and to experience more dreams is to wake up at least once in the middle of the night when REM is most active and to go back to sleep to reactivate it. Mystery is also another tool for collecting or redefining forms. Imagine a plastic bag, it can take on a shape of almost any form. Imagine asking what’s in the bag? This sense of mystery with a bag’s shape can give us a sense of how a plastic bag perhaps can be used to create a form in which to design a use to create narrative. When you’ve finished with a form, you aren’t quite sure what it is, you can then think up ideas of functionality, reason, narrative, and iterate until it may become something purely unique or completely original. Shigeo Fukuda states, “I believe that in design, 30 percent dignity, 20 percent beauty and 50 percent absurdity are necessary,”. This quote can be relevant when creating a unique and seemingly original design or narrative. Things that are absurd stand out. I believe combining absurdity with unique forms and narratives can create unique pieces that cater to your own perspective on experimental ideas and concepts. The application of new forms can also be applied to stories and narratives where with the addition of feeling can also be used to create original story telling. For example: Being in the mindset of being a person on a planet by yourself without any knowledge what so every learning everything for the first time can introduce ways to tell stories using the sense of having a blank canvas with the ability to start with a basic premise, introduce conflict or vision, and to iterate until an original idea comes out, even if it’s not fully developed to the standard of quality seen in mainstream mediums. An easy solution for story and narrative building is to start with a simple idea. For example: man becomes a hero; woman discovers truth; creature becomes something important; a child discovers purpose; a servant becomes ruler; a slave becomes God. Starting with the fundamentals and iterating more with detail much like art can be the start to creating new facets of experimental story design to which can become original. Moreover I believe with the use of forms and creating illogical or experimental ideas demands a certain level of practice to see what sticks with an audience. Perhaps it demands a certain level of crazy if one sees a level of abstraction and logical fallacy. In conclusion, examining and rediscovering forms and using fundamentals can be useful approaches to creating original concepts, designs, narratives, and ideas.

Special Welfare-like System for Artisans?

I came up with an idea a while ago that what if there was some way beginning and intermediate artists wanted to live for their passion for art. Could there be a system for this? Then I came up with an idea for a welfare-like system but made for artists, artisans, content creators, and perhaps students. I think individuals on this system would be able to collect $500 a month plus benefits they may quality for. However, there is a catch. Individuals on such system must produce a piece or pieces of certain quality every six months. For example: A quality: painting, 3D model, digital art, animation short, film short, book, sculpture, music or dance video, invention, or patented idea…etc. I think the use of this system can result in a nation where talents and skills are produced. Individuals can have the ability to dedicate themselves and grow in their talents; individuals can then be given or introduced to entrepreneurial opportunities; introduce new and expand existing culture, motivate and inspire others in the nation and around the world with new ideas, visions, and concepts. Perhaps ideas which can even inspire science and innovation. I believe the use of such a system can give people a piece of mind and time to focus on their skills and ideas which can help a country’s future because they don’t have to worry about the struggles of having to worry about survival. Ultimately the mission would be to increase the country’s productivity, trades, ideas, and talents without the worry of survival for the purpose of creating a country and culture of artisans. If conditions are not met for creating a piece or pieces of quality within the six month time frame, then an individual will have two weeks of correction of their work, or they will be given a strike. Once they receive three strikes, they can no longer quality for the system. Perhaps there is a twenty year waiting period in which they can get back onto the system.

First analog. Next digital. What's next?

Today I talked about what I thought was the next leap in theoretical future technologies. Simply stated, at first we had analog; next came digital; and the next leap I think is a physical digital technology where there is a heavy use of complex digital systems which uses a variety of mixed energies, magnetic fields, polarity techniques, frequencies, and perhaps materials that are human-made and not natural to any material found in our universe. Using my imagination, I think this technology creates a form in which can interact in both the digital and real world. I want to call this technology idea Metasynch. I believe the process of getting to that point where digital is capable of becoming physical and intractable with reality is still long ways away. Although I hate the mainstream idea and propaganda of the use of AI and robots (obvious because the malevolent ideology that follows with global elites and shady organizations), I believe such technologies can't be created without the use of artificial technological help.

Could it be a good idea to add "thank you" and "I'm sorry" lights to cars?

Imagine minding your own business when a random black pickup truck blasts out in front of you. You pass them by and they look at you but not with the usual angry it's-always-your-fault face but a gesture of saying sorry. In Japan they blink their hazard lights as a method of showing gratitude or apology, therefore why not have a light on cars that officially stands for this action. Why not have car manufacturers install "thank you" or "I'm sorry" lights on a car. Could this be a useful method to create or improve western traffic etiquette. Perhaps this can be a fun bonus feature on cars or an after market product. The lights itself doesn't have to have a thank you text or I'm sorry text. Perhaps it could be a "like" thumbs up shaped light and the sorry light can be a peace shaped light. Perhaps simple ideas such as these can be worth experimenting with to improve one's driving experience.

Taking it a step forward, why not have a digital display banner behind one's car. Where one can add custom scrolling texts or a push a button to say sorry, thank you, or a stated intention. Perhaps this can make life on the road more immersive, interesting, and meaningful. I think it allows for a layer to communicate with other drivers. The negative side to this, as far as I can see is advertising, distraction, and people inputting custom texts that are irresponsible or irrational. Regardless of the negatives, I think it's still worth experimenting.

Education as an immersive gaming experience?

Imagine a videogame, virtual reality experience, or reality-based gaming experience at a local school. Imagine students interacting with each other without the constraints of social interactions and sharing a common goal to progress and achieve. Could this help the students learn?
I had the crazy idea to have education be like a video game or a reality-based gaming experience. 
What if there was a class that used gaming platforms to which students enjoyed. Where grades acted like levels and where a student had to pass one obstacle to get to another while in the meantime learning without even knowing. An experience that perhaps allows them to work at their own pace and develops a personal strategy to approach problems and obtain solutions. If individuals at a young age adapt to technology very quickly, perhaps this could be an experiential platform and strategy that could accelerate their learning while also providing the balance of allowing them to develop their personalities, intellectuality, interpersonal communication, and creating an interpersonal social bond with others.

If such a class or activity were to be developed, I would imagine it would require psychologists, sociologists, and game designers to collaborate functional strategies to make education entertaining, stimulating, simulating, collaborative, and immersive. This allows students with different patterns of learning to learn and achieve based on their psychological development and processes. We can tweak difficulties and obstacles to cater to a student's individual needs and perhaps in the future control the rate in which they learn. Perhaps this could become or play a role in the future of education.