The Art of Rational Debate

When I listen to debates, often the sight of ridiculing, taunting, or attacking is demonstrated. Although some may say it’s justifiable, I see it as nothing useful if there is nothing one can take away from the debate or learn. For that reason, instead of having debates where it seems two or more cavemen are fighting over a mate, I believe debates should have a rationalized art form. Therefore, this is my idea of rational debates:

Individuals should start the conversation slow and at a harmonious pace. In the beginning each individual should state their thesis, position and lastly their opinion; if necessary, it would be a good idea to give brief introduction. In addition, the highlights of the discussion should be moderately brief and completely understandable. It’s crucial that there should be no interruptions or distractions what-so- ever. Any distractions could interrupt one’s ability to focus. Another reason why I believe it’s important to have pauses is so that no idea is skipped. When everyone has had their input, then the official discussions should start. Under no circumstances should one talk bad about another. Doing so reflect irrationality, a lack of professionalism and compassion. If I may add an example, it could be that someone said an idea another is not in favor of. I believe the individual who is in disagreement should state the idea why they disagree, however giving credit to the other individual they are in disagreement with, and reinforcing their idea with an idea they believe would be more functional. It’s the building and sharing of ideas which make rational debate meaningful. If I may emphasize, accusing or talking bad about another person defeats the purpose of a rational debate. Instead all ideas should be discussed and reinforced whether politically correct or not. Moreover, throughout the duration of the discussion, there should be one to two minute pauses. Again to allow individuals to recover, think, and digest information. The purpose of the discussion is not just to discuss topics, it is also to learn from each other and share ideas. Furthermore, during the duration of the discussion, all individuals should provide input. If one has become nonresponsive, it is with good intention to seek their opinion. If they have no opinions then they should state the reason why. If a discussion becomes heated, there should also still be a thirty seconds to a minute to pause. If an individual becomes targeted for any reason, others should step in and stabilize the situation by changing the mood. If possible have a rotation or change in the individuals discussing. In conclusion all discussions should be calm, collective, compassionate, civilized, rational and if possible educational. Doing so should present all ideas to the table and make the discussion valuable for its audience.